» Articles » PMID: 17433797

Video-capsule Endoscopy Gastric and Small Bowel Transit Time and Completeness of the Examination in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Overview
Journal Dig Liver Dis
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2007 Apr 17
PMID 17433797
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Small intestine video-capsule endoscopy examination in patients with diabetes mellitus may be incomplete due to delayed gastric emptying.

Aim: To measure video-capsule endoscopy gastric and small bowel transit time and to assess the completeness of the examination in diabetes mellitus patients.

Methods: In this retrospective, case-control study, we examined capsule endoscopy videos from 29 consecutive diabetes mellitus patients. Fifty-eight matched for sex, type of preparation, age and reason for referral non-diabetic controls were selected from our video-capsule endoscopy database. Two independent experienced investigators measured transit times and assessed examinations' completeness.

Results: Video-capsule endoscopy gastric transit time was significantly longer in diabetes mellitus (87, 1-478 min) compared to non-diabetic patients (24, 4-108 min, p<0.001). The caecum was visualized in 20/29 (69%) diabetes mellitus and 52/58 (89.6%) non-diabetic controls (p=0.02). In 16 diabetes mellitus patients that video-capsule endoscopy reached the caecum, small bowel transit time was significantly shorter (261.2+/-55.5 min) compared to their 32 non-diabetic matched controls (302+/-62.7 min, p=0.03).

Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have prolonged video-capsule endoscopy gastric transit time compared to non-diabetic patients. Prospective studies are required to complete our understanding of video-capsule endoscopy transit times in the setting of diabetes mellitus.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting the efficacy of small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain.

He X, Xu Q, Xue H Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11:1515823.

PMID: 40051571 PMC: 11882506. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1515823.


Clinical usefulness and acceptability of small-bowel capsule endoscopy with panoramic imaging compared with axial imaging in Japanese patients.

Hirata I, Tsuboi A, Matsubara Y, Sumioka A, Takasago T, Tanaka H DEN Open. 2024; 5(1):e389.

PMID: 38845631 PMC: 11154819. DOI: 10.1002/deo2.389.


Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Population Model for Diabetic Patients and its Application to Understand Disease-drug-drug Interactions.

Li Y, Li X, Zhu M, Liu H, Lei Z, Yao X Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024; 63(6):831-845.

PMID: 38819713 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-024-01383-2.


Influence of metabolic state and body composition on the action of pharmacological treatment of migraine.

Bruijn N, van Lohuizen R, Boron M, Fitzek M, Gabriele F, Giuliani G J Headache Pain. 2024; 25(1):20.

PMID: 38347465 PMC: 10863119. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01724-3.


Prolonged Gastric Transit Time in Small-Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: Which Patients Are at Risk and What Are the Implications?.

Freitas M, Macedo Silva V, Xavier S, Boal Carvalho P, Rosa B, Moreira M Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023; 34(3):227-233.

PMID: 36620926 PMC: 10152174. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22191.