» Articles » PMID: 17431492

Workgroup Report: Base Stations and Wireless Networks-radiofrequency (RF) Exposures and Health Consequences

Overview
Date 2007 Apr 14
PMID 17431492
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) waves have long been used for different types of information exchange via the air waves--wireless Morse code, radio, television, and wireless telephone (i.e., construction and operation of telephones or telephone systems). Increasingly larger numbers of people rely on mobile telephone technology, and health concerns about the associated RF exposure have been raised, particularly because the mobile phone handset operates in close proximity to the human body, and also because large numbers of base station antennas are required to provide widespread availability of service to large populations. The World Health Organization convened an expert workshop to discuss the current state of cellular-telephone health issues, and this article brings together several of the key points that were addressed. The possibility of RF health effects has been investigated in epidemiology studies of cellular telephone users and workers in RF occupations, in experiments with animals exposed to cell-phone RF, and via biophysical consideration of cell-phone RF electric-field intensity and the effect of RF modulation schemes. As summarized here, these separate avenues of scientific investigation provide little support for adverse health effects arising from RF exposure at levels below current international standards. Moreover, radio and television broadcast waves have exposed populations to RF for > 50 years with little evidence of deleterious health consequences. Despite unavoidable uncertainty, current scientific data are consistent with the conclusion that public exposures to permissible RF levels from mobile telephone and base stations are not likely to adversely affect human health.

Citing Articles

Lipoic acid inhibits cognitive impairment induced by multiple cell phones in young male rats: role of Sirt1 and Atg7 pathway.

El-Kafoury B, Abdel-Hady E, El Bakly W, Elayat W, Hamam G, Abd El Rahman S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18486.

PMID: 37898621 PMC: 10613255. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44134-2.


The potential adverse effect of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation on the testes of prenatally exposed peripubertal male rats.

Andraskova S, Holovska K, Sevcikova Z, Andrejcakova Z, Toth S, Martoncikova M Histol Histopathol. 2021; 37(3):287-299.

PMID: 34854072 DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-402.


Potential influence of prenatal 2.45 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on Wistar albino rat testis.

Almasiova V, Holovska K, Andraskova S, Cigankova V, Sevcikova Z, Racek A Histol Histopathol. 2021; 36(6):685-696.

PMID: 33779980 DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-331.


Microtubular structure impairment after GSM-modulated RF radiation exposure.

Marjanovic cermak A, Ilic K, Pavicic I Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2020; 71(3):205-210.

PMID: 33074167 PMC: 7968504. DOI: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3267.


Challenges in coupling atmospheric electricity with biological systems.

Hunting E, Matthews J, de Arroyabe Hernaez P, England S, Kourtidis K, Koh K Int J Biometeorol. 2020; 65(1):45-58.

PMID: 32666310 PMC: 7782408. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-020-01960-7.


References
1.
Adair R . Biophysical limits on athermal effects of RF and microwave radiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002; 24(1):39-48. DOI: 10.1002/bem.10061. View

2.
Elder J, Chou C . Auditory response to pulsed radiofrequency energy. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003; Suppl 6:S162-73. DOI: 10.1002/bem.10163. View

3.
Wilen J, Hornsten R, Sandstrom M, Bjerle P, Wiklund U, Stensson O . Electromagnetic field exposure and health among RF plastic sealer operators. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003; 25(1):5-15. DOI: 10.1002/bem.10154. View

4.
Jauchem J . A literature review of medical side effects from radio-frequency energy in the human environment: involving cancer, tumors, and problems of the central nervous system. J Microw Power Electromagn Energy. 2004; 38(2):103-23. DOI: 10.1080/08327823.2003.11688492. View

5.
Renn O . Perception of risks. Toxicol Lett. 2004; 149(1-3):405-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051. View