» Articles » PMID: 17429654

Central Ventilatory Control in the South American Lungfish, Lepidosiren Paradoxa: Contributions of PH and CO(2)

Overview
Date 2007 Apr 13
PMID 17429654
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lungfish represent a probable sister group to the land vertebrates. Lungfish and tetrapods share features of respiratory control, including central, peripheral and intrapulmonary CO(2) receptors. We investigated whether or not central chemoreceptors in the lungfish, L. paradoxa, are stimulated by CO(2) and/or pH. Ventilation was measured by pneumotachography for diving animals. The fourth cerebral ventricle was equipped with two catheters for superfusion. Initially, two control groups were compared: (1) catheterized animals with no superfusion and (2) animals superfused with mock CSF solutions at pH = 7.45; PCO(2) = 21 mmHg. The two groups had virtually the same ventilation of about 40 ml BTPS kg(-1) h(-1) (P > 0.05). Next, PCO(2) was increased from 21 to 42 mmHg, while pH(CSF) was kept at 7.45, which increased ventilation from 40 to 75 ml BTPS kg(-1) h(-1). Conversely, a decrease of pH(CSF) from 7.45 to 7.20 (PCO(2) = 21 mmHg) increased ventilation to 111 ml BTPS kg(-1) h(-1). Further decreases of pH(CSF) had little effect on ventilation, and the combination of pH(CSF) = 7.10 and PCO(2) = 42 mmHg reduced ventilation to 63 ml BTPS kg(-1) h(-1).

Citing Articles

Structural determinants of CO-sensitivity in the β connexin family suggested by evolutionary analysis.

Dospinescu V, Nijjar S, Spanos F, Cook J, de Wolf E, Biscotti M Commun Biol. 2019; 2:331.

PMID: 31508505 PMC: 6726660. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0576-2.


Evolutionary adaptation of the sensitivity of connexin26 hemichannels to CO2.

de Wolf E, Cook J, Dale N Proc Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1848).

PMID: 28148750 PMC: 5310615. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2723.

References
1.
Eldridge F, Kiley J, Millhorn D . Respiratory responses to medullary hydrogen ion changes in cats: different effects of respiratory and metabolic acidoses. J Physiol. 1985; 358:285-97. PMC: 1193342. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015551. View

2.
Kinkead R, Milsom W . Role of pulmonary stretch receptor feedback in control of episodic breathing in the bullfrog. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272(2 Pt 2):R497-508. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1997.272.2.R497. View

3.
Bernard D, Li A, Nattie E . Evidence for central chemoreception in the midline raphé. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996; 80(1):108-15. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.1.108. View

4.
Lahiri S, Forster 2nd R . CO2/H(+) sensing: peripheral and central chemoreception. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003; 35(10):1413-35. DOI: 10.1016/s1357-2725(03)00050-5. View

5.
Milsom W, Abe A, Andrade D, Tattersall G . Evolutionary trends in airway CO2/H+ chemoreception. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2004; 144(2-3):191-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2004.06.021. View