» Articles » PMID: 1741480

Axon Contacts and Acetylcholinesterase Activity on Chicken Intrafusal Muscle Fiber Types Identified by Their Myosin Heavy Chain Composition

Overview
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 1741480
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Muscle spindles of 8-week old chicken tibialis anterior muscles were examined to determine if specific intrafusal fiber types were also characterized by differences in motor innervation. Incubation with a monoclonal antibody against myosin heavy chains permitted the identification of strongly reactive, moderately reactive and unreactive intrafusal fibers. The innervation of each fiber type was evaluated in silver-impregnated sections, and in sections incubated with a monoclonal antibody against acetylcholinesterase. There was no acetylcholinesterase activity at the midequator of any fiber. At the juxtaequator and at the pole strongly reactive fibers typically exhibited fewer axon contacts and less acetylcholinesterase activity than unreactive and moderately reactive fibers. Differences were also recognized at neuromuscular junctions in the size and shape of acetylcholinesterase-positive sites. At the juxtaequator and at the pole strongly reactive fibers and moderately reactive fibers displayed significantly more small, dot-like acetylcholinesterase sites than unreactive fibers. On the contrary, the greatest number of larger, stout sites was found on unreactive fibers and the least number on strongly reactive fibers. Moderately reactive fibers took an intermediate position. The results indicate that myosin heavy chain-based chicken intrafusal fiber types are also set apart by differences in innervation.

Citing Articles

Pax7 shows higher satellite cell frequencies and concentrations within intrafusal fibers of muscle spindles.

Kirkpatrick L, Allouh M, Nightingale C, Devon H, Yablonka-Reuveni Z, Rosser B J Histochem Cytochem. 2008; 56(9):831-40.

PMID: 18541708 PMC: 2516954. DOI: 10.1369/jhc.2008.951608.


Structure, distribution and innervation of muscle spindles in avian fast and slow skeletal muscle.

Ovalle W, DOW P, Nahirney P J Anat. 1999; 194 ( Pt 3):381-94.

PMID: 10386776 PMC: 1467938. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19430381.x.


Transient expression of a ventricular myosin heavy chain isoform in developing chicken intrafusal muscle fibers.

Maier A Histochemistry. 1993; 99(4):333-8.

PMID: 8500996 DOI: 10.1007/BF00269106.


Regional differences in organization of the extracellular matrix and cytoskeleton at the equator of chicken intrafusal muscle fibres.

Maier A, Mayne R J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1993; 14(1):35-46.

PMID: 8478427 DOI: 10.1007/BF00132178.


Development of chicken intrafusal muscle fibers.

Maier A Cell Tissue Res. 1993; 274(2):383-91.

PMID: 8269484 DOI: 10.1007/BF00318757.


References
1.
BOYD I . The response of fast and slow nuclear bag fibres and nuclear chain fibres in isolated cat muscle spindles to fusimotor stimulation, and the effect of intrafusal contraction on the sensory endings. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1976; 61(3):203-54. DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1976.sp002354. View

2.
Adal M, Barker D . INTRAMUSCULAR BRANCHING OF FUSIMOTOR FIBRES. J Physiol. 1965; 177:288-99. PMC: 1357245. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007592. View

3.
Maier A, Zak R . Reactivity of rat and rabbit intrafusal fibers with monoclonal antibodies directed against myosin heavy chains. Anat Rec. 1989; 225(3):197-202. DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092250304. View

4.
Maier A, Gambke B, Pette D . Immunohistochemical demonstration of embryonic myosin heavy chains in adult mammalian intrafusal fibers. Histochemistry. 1988; 88(3-6):267-71. DOI: 10.1007/BF00570283. View

5.
Ovalle W, Smith R . Histochemical identification of three types of intrafusal muscle fibers in the cat and monkey based on the myosin ATPase reaction. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1972; 50(3):195-202. DOI: 10.1139/y72-030. View