» Articles » PMID: 17403766

The Economic Burden of Complications During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2007 Apr 4
PMID 17403766
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Technological advances have enabled percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to be applied with expanding indications. However, escalating costs are of concern. This study assessed the incremental medical costs of major in-hospital procedural complications incurred by patients undergoing PCI.

Methods: We considered all patients undergoing elective, urgent, or emergent PCI at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 3/1/1998-3/31/2003 in analyses. Clinical, angiographic, and outcome data were derived from the Mayo Clinic PCI Registry. In-hospital PCI complications included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and bleeding of clinical significance. Administrative data were used to estimate total costs in standardised, year 2004, constant-US dollars. We used generalised linear modeling to estimate costs associated with complications adjusting for baseline and procedural characteristics.

Results: 1071 (13.2%) of patients experienced complications during hospitalisation. Patients experiencing complications were older, more likely to present with emergent PCI, recent or prior myocardial infarction, multi-vessel disease, and comorbid conditions than patients who did not experience these events. Unadjusted total costs were, on average, $27,865+/-$39,424 for complicated patient episodes compared to $12,279+/-$6796 for episodes that were complication free (p<0.0001). Adjusted mean costs were $6984 higher for complicated PCIs compared with uncomplicated PCI episodes (95% CI of cost difference: $5801, $8168). Incremental costs associated with isolated bleeding events, MACCE, or for both bleeding and MACCE events were $5883, $5086, and $15,437, respectively (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: This high-volume study highlights the significant economic burden associated with procedural complications. Resources and systems approaches to minimising clinical and economic complications in PCI are warranted.

Citing Articles

Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures.

Lenarczyk R, Proietti M, Scheitz J, Shah D, Siebert E, Gorog D Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39394524 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0.


Transradial Access for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications of the Risk-Treatment Paradox.

Amin A, Rao S, Seto A, Thangam M, Bach R, Pancholy S Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14(7):e009328.

PMID: 34253050 PMC: 8895384. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009328.


Effects of progranulin on the pathological conditions in experimental myocardial infarction model.

Sasaki T, Shimazawa M, Kanamori H, Yamada Y, Nishinaka A, Kuse Y Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):11842.

PMID: 32678228 PMC: 7367277. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68804-7.


Cost-effectiveness of orbital atherectomy compared to rotational atherectomy in treating patients with severely calcified coronary artery lesions in Japan.

Pietzsch J, Geisler B, Ikeno F Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017; 33(4):328-336.

PMID: 28875395 PMC: 6153894. DOI: 10.1007/s12928-017-0488-3.


Strategies for Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Based on Risk Stratification by the ACC/AHA Lipid Guidelines, ATP III Guidelines, Coronary Calcium Scoring, and C-Reactive Protein, and a Global Treat-All Strategy: A....

Galper B, Wang Y, Einstein A PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0138092.

PMID: 26422204 PMC: 4589241. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138092.


References
1.
Singh M, Lennon R, Holmes Jr D, Bell M, Rihal C . Correlates of procedural complications and a simple integer risk score for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40(3):387-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01980-0. View

2.
Morice M, Serruys P, Sousa J, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M . A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(23):1773-80. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843. View

3.
Moscucci M, Muller D, Watts C, Bahl V, Bates E, Werns S . Reducing costs and improving outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Manag Care. 2003; 9(5):365-72. View

4.
Ferguson Jr T, Peterson E, Coombs L, Eiken M, Carey M, Grover F . Use of continuous quality improvement to increase use of process measures in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003; 290(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.1.49. View

5.
Moses J, Leon M, Popma J, Fitzgerald P, Holmes D, OShaughnessy C . Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(14):1315-23. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa035071. View