Detection of Lymph-node Metastases with Integrated [11C]choline PET/CT in Patients with PSA Failure After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Results Confirmed by Open Pelvic-retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of integrated [(11)C]choline-PET/CT in the diagnosis of lymph-node recurrence in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after surgery.
Methods: Since October 2002, 25 patients with biochemical recurrence (median PSA: 1.98 ng/ml), based on evidence of lymph-node metastases on [(11)C]choline-PET/CT scan (21 cases) or conventional imaging (4 cases), were scheduled for either bilateral pelvic (12 cases) or both pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (13 patients).
Results: Sixty-three nodal sites were evaluated histologically. The mean number of nodes removed and positive nodes were 21.92+/-16.91 (range: 4-74) and 8.84+/-9.65 (range: 1-31), respectively. Of the four patients with negative [(11)C]choline-PET/CT and positive magnetic resonance, none had nodal metastases. Nineteen of the 21 patients (90%) with positive [(11)C]choline-PET/CT had nodal metastases of prostate adenocarcinoma at histologic evaluation. A lesion-based analysis showed that [(11)C]choline-PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 64%, 90%, 86%, 72%, and 77%, respectively. The mean maximum diameter of true positive metastases was larger than false-negative ones (15.0 vs. 6.3mm; p=0.0004).
Conclusions: [(11)C]Choline-PET/CT is an accurate diagnostic tool for the detection of lymph-node metastases of recurrent prostate cancer. The low negative predictive value seems to depend on the limited capability of [(11)C]choline-PET/CT to detect microscopic lesions. The high positive predictive value, even with low PSA values, provides a basis for further treatment decisions.
Role of F-FCH PET/CT in Detecting Recurrences of Prostate Cancer After Curative Treatments.
Altini C, Niccoli Asabella A, Tramacere F, Sardaro A, Pisani A, Castelluccia A Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2024; 33(1):1-10.
PMID: 38390705 PMC: 10899743. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2023.26122.
Emerging Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer: Current State and Future Perspectives.
Volpe F, Nappi C, Piscopo L, Zampella E, Mainolfi C, Ponsiglione A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(19).
PMID: 37835440 PMC: 10571937. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194746.
Fodor A, Brombin C, Deantoni C, Giannini L, Ferrario F, Villa S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 51(2):590-603.
PMID: 37747578 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06445-4.
The Performance of FDA-Approved PET Imaging Agents in the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Li M, Zelchan R, Orlova A Biomedicines. 2022; 10(10).
PMID: 36289795 PMC: 9599369. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102533.
A new concept for the production of C-labelled radiotracers.
Wenz J, Arndt F, Samnick S EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2022; 7(1):6.
PMID: 35347490 PMC: 8960519. DOI: 10.1186/s41181-022-00159-y.