» Articles » PMID: 17390112

Global Profiling of EGFR Gene Mutation, Amplification, Regulation and Tissue Protein Expression in Unknown Primary Carcinomas: to Target or Not to Target?

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Mar 29
PMID 17390112
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling contributes to malignant transformation and survival. We studied molecular predictors of benefit from EGFR-modulating therapies in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP).

Materials And Methods: Tumours from paraffin-embedded biopsies of 50 patients with CUP were stained for EGFR protein by immunohistochemistry. Polymerase chain reaction amplification, single-strand conformational polymorphism and direct sequencing were used to study EGFR intron 1 cytosine-adenosine (CA) repeat length as well as exon 18, 19, 21 activating mutations and amplification.

Results: Thirty-seven tumours (74%) expressed EGFR protein but only six (12%) strongly. Regarding intron 1 CA repeat length, we detected five alleles with CA repeat numbers 16-20, allele 16 being the most common (39%). All samples were heterozygous, the commonest genotype consisting of 16/18 dinucleotides (78%). Five samples had three intron 1 alleles and were associated with EGFR overexpression in 40% of cases. There was no evidence of EGFR exon 18, 19, 21 amplification. Two mutations were detected: Exon 21 2508 C > T, a silent nucleotide polymorphism (R836R) and a G > A substitution in sequences flanking exon 19 (IVS19 + 24G > A) resulting in aberrant mRNA splicing. Neither EGFR protein expression nor CA repeat length were prognostic factors for survival.

Conclusions: Our data depict absence of molecular predictors of benefit from EGFR modulation in patients with CUP. Study of its molecular pathophysiology and targeting other molecular pathways may be warranted instead.

Citing Articles

Progress in refining the clinical management of cancer of unknown primary in the molecular era.

Rassy E, Pavlidis N Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020; 17(9):541-554.

PMID: 32350398 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0359-1.


Exploring the biological hallmarks of cancer of unknown primary: where do we stand today?.

Rassy E, Assi T, Pavlidis N Br J Cancer. 2020; 122(8):1124-1132.

PMID: 32042068 PMC: 7156745. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0723-z.


Relationship between EGFR expression and subcellular localization with cancer development and clinical outcome.

Yan G, Saeed M, Foersch S, Schneider J, Roth W, Efferth T Oncotarget. 2019; 10(20):1918-1931.

PMID: 30956774 PMC: 6443015. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26727.


A case of occult intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed by autopsy.

Oda E, Hashimoto D, Shiomi Y, Ohnishi K, Hayashi H, Chikamoto A Surg Case Rep. 2016; 1(1):101.

PMID: 26943425 PMC: 4605921. DOI: 10.1186/s40792-015-0106-5.


Predictive and prognostic molecular markers for cholangiocarcinoma in Han Chinese population.

Meng L, Tian Z, Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu J Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(8):13680-9.

PMID: 26550313 PMC: 4612998.


References
1.
Weinstein I . Cancer. Addiction to oncogenes--the Achilles heal of cancer. Science. 2002; 297(5578):63-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1073096. View

2.
Baselga J, Arteaga C . Critical update and emerging trends in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(11):2445-59. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.890. View

3.
Brandt B, Hermann S, Straif K, Tidow N, Buerger H, Chang-Claude J . Modification of breast cancer risk in young women by a polymorphic sequence in the egfr gene. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(1):7-12. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-2623. View

4.
Sordella R, Bell D, Haber D, Settleman J . Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways. Science. 2004; 305(5687):1163-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1101637. View

5.
Schlessinger J . Ligand-induced, receptor-mediated dimerization and activation of EGF receptor. Cell. 2002; 110(6):669-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00966-2. View