» Articles » PMID: 17386082

Availability and Quality of Paraffin Blocks Identified in Pathology Archives: a Multi-institutional Study by the Shared Pathology Informatics Network (SPIN)

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Mar 28
PMID 17386082
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Shared Pathology Informatics Network (SPIN) is a tissue resource initiative that utilizes clinical reports of the vast amount of paraffin-embedded tissues routinely stored by medical centers. SPIN has an informatics component (sending tissue-related queries to multiple institutions via the internet) and a service component (providing histopathologically annotated tissue specimens for medical research). This paper examines if tissue blocks, identified by localized computer searches at participating institutions, can be retrieved in adequate quantity and quality to support medical researchers.

Methods: Four centers evaluated pathology reports (1990-2005) for common and rare tumors to determine the percentage of cases where suitable tissue blocks with tumor were available. Each site generated a list of 100 common tumor cases (25 cases each of breast adenocarcinoma, colonic adenocarcinoma, lung squamous carcinoma, and prostate adenocarcinoma) and 100 rare tumor cases (25 cases each of adrenal cortical carcinoma, gastro-intestinal stromal tumor [GIST], adenoid cystic carcinoma, and mycosis fungoides) using a combination of Tumor Registry, laboratory information system (LIS) and/or SPIN-related tools. Pathologists identified the slides/blocks with tumor and noted first 3 slides with largest tumor and availability of the corresponding block.

Results: Common tumors cases (n = 400), the institutional retrieval rates (all blocks) were 83% (A), 95% (B), 80% (C), and 98% (D). Retrieval rate (tumor blocks) from all centers for common tumors was 73% with mean largest tumor size of 1.49 cm; retrieval (tumor blocks) was highest-lung (84%) and lowest-prostate (54%). Rare tumors cases (n = 400), each institution's retrieval rates (all blocks) were 78% (A), 73% (B), 67% (C), and 84% (D). Retrieval rate (tumor blocks) from all centers for rare tumors was 66% with mean largest tumor size of 1.56 cm; retrieval (tumor blocks) was highest for GIST (72%) and lowest for adenoid cystic carcinoma (58%).

Conclusion: Assessment shows availability and quality of archival tissue blocks that are retrievable and associated electronic data that can be of value for researchers. This study serves to compliment the data from which uniform use of the SPIN query tools by all four centers will be measured to assure and highlight the usefulness of archival material for obtaining tumor tissues for research.

Citing Articles

REDCap and the National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank-a scalable and sustainable model for rare disease biorepositories.

Rashid R, Copelli S, Silverstein J, Becich M J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(10):1634-1644.

PMID: 37487555 PMC: 10531116. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad132.


A machine learning approach to identify predictive molecular markers for cisplatin chemosensitivity following surgical resection in ovarian cancer.

Shannon N, Tan L, Tan Q, Tan J, Hendrikson J, Ng W Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):16829.

PMID: 34413360 PMC: 8377048. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96072-6.


Improved de-identification of physician notes through integrative modeling of both public and private medical text.

McMurry A, Fitch B, Savova G, Kohane I, Reis B BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13:112.

PMID: 24083569 PMC: 3907029. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-112.


SHRINE: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies.

McMurry A, Murphy S, MacFadden D, Weber G, Simons W, Orechia J PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e55811.

PMID: 23533569 PMC: 3591385. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055811.


Bridging the gap: moving predictive and prognostic assays from research to clinical use.

Williams P, Lively T, Jessup J, Conley B Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(6):1531-9.

PMID: 22422405 PMC: 3307151. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2203.


References
1.
Glass A, Donis-Keller H, Mies C, Russo J, Zehnbauer B, Taube S . The Cooperative Breast Cancer Tissue Resource: archival tissue for the investigation of tumor markers. Clin Cancer Res. 2001; 7(7):1843-9. View

2.
Becich M . The role of the pathologist as tissue refiner and data miner: the impact of functional genomics on the modern pathology laboratory and the critical roles of pathology informatics and bioinformatics. Mol Diagn. 2001; 5(4):287-99. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262090. View

3.
Grizzle W, Woodruff K, Trainer T . The pathologist's role in the use of human tissues in research--legal, ethical, and other issues. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996; 120(10):909-12. View

4.
Fetsch P, Simone N, Bryant-Greenwood P, Marincola F, Filie A, Petricoin E . Proteomic evaluation of archival cytologic material using SELDI affinity mass spectrometry: potential for diagnostic applications. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002; 118(6):870-6. DOI: 10.1309/EJKL-7328-KFPR-56WA. View

5.
Schadow G, McDonald C . Extracting structured information from free text pathology reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2004; :584-8. PMC: 1480213. View