» Articles » PMID: 17386053

High Frequency Thalamic Stimulation for Inoperable Mesial Temporal Epilepsy

Overview
Journal Epilepsia
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 Mar 28
PMID 17386053
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of high-frequency periodic thalamic stimulation in inoperable mesial temporal epilepsy and the usefulness of intracranially evoked responses for assessment of anatomical uniformity of lead placement.

Methods: Four subjects were implanted with leads aimed at the anterior thalamic nuclei. Six weeks later, Soletra IPGs were activated using parameters similar to the closed-loop trial's (mean: 175 Hz; 4.1 V; 90 mus; 1 min ON, 5 min OFF). Efficacy was assessed by comparing percentage change in seizure frequency over a 6-month baseline versus a 36-month treatment period, using a within-subjects repeated measures design. Tolerability and safety were similarly monitored. Evoked responses elicited by thalamic stimulation were recorded from depth electrodes in the amygdalo-hippocampal regions and compared intra and interindividually.

Results: All subjects completed the study, tolerated stimulation and had no serious adverse effects. Mean reduction in seizure frequency was 75.6% (t =-8.24; p < or = 0.01) (range: 92% to 53%). Quality of life improved in all. Verification of electrode placement with a software function indicated that stimulated structures were presumably, Anterior thalami, Latero-polaris, Reticulatus Polaris, Ventro-oralis Internus, and Campus Forelii. Evoked responses from stimulated sites were heterogeneous, intra and interindividually, also suggesting a lack of uniformity in lead placement.

Conclusions: High-frequency, periodic, round-the-clock thalamic stimulation seems safe, well tolerated and efficacious for inoperable mesial temporal epilepsy. Identification of clinically useful parameters may be facilitated by brief closed-loop trials. Selective stimulation of a single structure may not be feasible at certain intensities, nor required for efficacy. Evoked responses may be useful for verification of uniformity of target acquisition.

Citing Articles

Local and Remote Chemogenetic Suppression of Hippocampal Seizures in Rats.

Li D, Yan X, Xing Y, Yan J, Wang J, Zhang H Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024; 22(13):2240-2255.

PMID: 38333970 PMC: 11337692. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X22999240131122455.


Ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant focal aware motor seizures: illustrative case.

Vilela-Filho O, Ragazzo P, Goulart L, Arruda F, Arruda M, Milhomem C J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023; 5(14).

PMID: 37014006 PMC: 10555550. DOI: 10.3171/CASE2320.


DBS of the ANT for refractory epilepsy: A single center experience of seizure reduction, side effects and neuropsychological outcomes.

Dague K, Witt J, von Wrede R, Helmstaedter C, Surges R Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1106511.

PMID: 36970547 PMC: 10033684. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1106511.


Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in the MORE Multicenter Patient Registry.

Peltola J, Colon A, Pimentel J, Coenen V, Gil-Nagel A, Goncalves Ferreira A Neurology. 2023; 100(18):e1852-e1865.

PMID: 36927882 PMC: 10159763. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206887.


Estimation of ANT-DBS Electrodes on Target Positioning Based on a New Percept PC LFP Signal Analysis.

Lopes E, Rego R, Rito M, Chamadoira C, Dias D, Silva Cunha J Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(17).

PMID: 36081060 PMC: 9460540. DOI: 10.3390/s22176601.