» Articles » PMID: 17384931

A Pilot Randomised Controlled Comparison of Continuous Veno-venous Haemofiltration and Extended Daily Dialysis with Filtration: Effect on Small Solutes and Acid-base Balance

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2007 Mar 27
PMID 17384931
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) is an established treatment for acute renal failure (ARF). Recently, extended intermittent dialytic techniques have been proposed for the treatment of ARF. The aim of this study was to compare these two approaches.

Setting: Intensive care unit of tertiary hospital.

Subjects: Sixteen critically ill patients with ARF.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Intervention: We randomised sixteen patients to three consecutive days of treatment with either CVVH (8) or extended daily dialysis with filtration (EDDf) (8) and compared small-solute, electrolyte and acid-base control.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two therapies for urea or creatinine levels over 3 days. Of 80 electrolyte measurements taken before treatment, 19 were abnormal. All values were corrected as a result of treatment, except for one patient in the CVVH group who developed hypophosphataemia (0.54 mmol/l) at 72 h. After 3 days of treatment, there was a mild but persistent metabolic acidosis in the EDDf group compared to the CVVH group (median bicarbonate: 20 mmol/l vs. 29 mmol/l: p=0.039; median base deficit: -4 mEq/l vs. -2.1 mEq/l, p=0.033).

Conclusions: CVVH and EDDf as prescribed achieved similar control of urea, creatinine and electrolytes. Acidosis was better controlled with CVVH.

Citing Articles

Nutritional management of children with acute kidney injury-clinical practice recommendations from the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce.

Vega M, Cerminara D, Desloovere A, Paglialonga F, Renken-Terhaerdt J, Walle J Pediatr Nephrol. 2023; 38(11):3559-3580.

PMID: 36939914 PMC: 10514117. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-05884-3.


Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.

Fayad A, Buamscha D, Ciapponi A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 11:CD010612.

PMID: 36416787 PMC: 9683115. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3.


Disease Severity Determines Timing of Initiating Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xia Z, He L, Pan S, Cheng R, Zhang Q, Liu Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:580144.

PMID: 34869398 PMC: 8636750. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.580144.


Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Mortality in Older Patients with Dialysis-Receiving Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury.

Li G, Lian X, Hao W, Hu W Int J Gen Med. 2021; 14:5693-5701.

PMID: 34557023 PMC: 8453641. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S326723.


Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Tsujimoto Y, Miki S, Shimada H, Tsujimoto H, Yasuda H, Kataoka Y Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 9:CD013330.

PMID: 34519356 PMC: 8438600. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013330.pub2.


References
1.
Schiffl H, Lang S, Fischer R . Daily hemodialysis and the outcome of acute renal failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(5):305-10. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010877. View

2.
Stewart P . Modern quantitative acid-base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1983; 61(12):1444-61. DOI: 10.1139/y83-207. View

3.
Silvester W, Bellomo R, Cole L . Epidemiology, management, and outcome of severe acute renal failure of critical illness in Australia. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(10):1910-5. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00010. View

4.
Kihara M, Ikeda Y, Shibata K, Masumori S, Fujita H, Ebira H . Slow hemodialysis performed during the day in managing renal failure in critically ill patients. Nephron. 1994; 67(1):36-41. DOI: 10.1159/000187885. View

5.
Lonnemann G, Floege J, Kliem V, Brunkhorst R, Koch K . Extended daily veno-venous high-flux haemodialysis in patients with acute renal failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome using a single path batch dialysis system. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000; 15(8):1189-93. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/15.8.1189. View