Absence of Conditioned Place Preference or Reinstatement with Bivalent Ligands Containing Mu-opioid Receptor Agonist and Delta-opioid Receptor Antagonist Pharmacophores
Overview
Affiliations
Treatment of pain with opioids is limited by their potential abuse liability. In an effort to develop analgesics without this side effect, a series of bivalent ligands containing a mu-opioid receptor agonist pharmacophore connected to a delta-opioid receptor antagonist pharmacophore through variable-length spacers (16-21 atoms) was synthesized. Members of this series [mu-opioid receptor (M)-delta-opioid receptor (D)-agonist (A)-antagonists (N): MDANs] are antinociceptive in the tail flick assay, but antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence do not develop to ligands having spacers with 19-21 atoms. The current studies compared the rewarding properties of three bivalent ligands (MDAN-16, -19 and -21) and a mu-opioid receptor agonist (MA-19) to those of morphine in the conditioned place preference assay in mice after i.v. administration. Place preference developed to morphine and to MA-19, but not to the MDANs. The responses to MDAN-16 were highly variable, although place preference of borderline significance appeared to develop. Reinstatement was also evaluated after extinguishing morphine conditioned place preference; morphine and MA-19, but not the MDANs, reinstated morphine conditioned place preference. Taken together, these results suggest that the bivalents are less rewarding compared to morphine in opioid-naïve mice and do not induce reinstatement in previously morphine-preferring mice. The lack of a conditioned place preference response for MDAN-19 and -21, compared to the equivocal results with MDAN-16, suggests a minimum distance requirement between mu-opioid receptor and delta-opioid receptor recognition sites. This requirement may reflect the binding of MDAN-19 and -21 to mu-opioid receptor-delta-opioid receptor heterodimeric receptors that block reward but not antinociception.
Buprenorphine Pharmacodynamics: A Bridge to Understanding Buprenorphine Clinical Benefits.
Davis M Drugs. 2025; 85(2):215-230.
PMID: 39873915 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02128-y.
Li Y, Eans S, Ganno-Sherwood M, Eliasof A, Houghten R, McLaughlin J Molecules. 2023; 28(22).
PMID: 38005269 PMC: 10674865. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28227548.
Scherrer K, Eans S, Medina J, Senadheera S, Khaliq T, Murray T Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(9).
PMID: 37765026 PMC: 10535824. DOI: 10.3390/ph16091218.
Class A and C GPCR Dimers in Neurodegenerative Diseases.
Caniceiro A, Bueschbell B, Schiedel A, Moreira I Curr Neuropharmacol. 2022; 20(11):2081-2141.
PMID: 35339177 PMC: 9886835. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X20666220327221830.
Central Nervous System Distribution of an Opioid Agonist Combination with Synergistic Activity.
Griffith J, Kim M, Bruce D, Peterson C, Kitto K, Mohammad A J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021; 380(1):34-46.
PMID: 34663676 PMC: 8969136. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.121.000821.