» Articles » PMID: 17371738

Mechanical Ventilation of Patients Hospitalized in Medical Wards Vs the Intensive Care Unit--an Observational, Comparative Study

Overview
Journal J Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2007 Mar 21
PMID 17371738
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In some hospitals, patients are mechanically ventilated on the wards in addition to the intensive care unit (ICU) because of the shortage of ICU beds.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome and ventilatory management of medical patients mechanically ventilated on the medical wards and in the ICU.

Design: This was a prospective, observational, noninterventional study over a 6-month period.

Setting: The study was conducted in internal medicine wards and the ICU of a 500-bed community university-affiliated hospital.

Patients: Ninety-nine mechanically ventilated medical patients in the ICU or on the medical wards because of shortage of ICU beds were included in the study.

Results: Baseline characteristics of the patients ventilated in the ICU (group 1) and in the medical wards (group 2) were collected. Thirty-four patients were ventilated in the ICU and 65 in the wards during the study period. In-hospital survival rate in group 1 was 38% vs 20% in group 2 (P < .05). The Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in group 1 was 24 +/- 7 vs 27 +/- 7 in group 2 (P < .05). Other prognostic factors were similar. The age of the survivors in the 2 groups was similar: 57 +/- 25 years in group 1 vs 69 +/- 13 years in group 2 (P = NS). Mean number of ventilatory changes in group 1 was 7.5 +/- 1.4 per day per patient, whereas it was 1.3 +/- 1.0 in group 2 (P < .001). The number of arterial blood gas analyses in group 1 was 7.7 +/- 1.2 per day per patient compared with 2.3 +/- 1.3 in group 2 (P < .001). Twenty percent (20%) of the patients in group 1 had endotracheal tube-related inadvertent events compared with 62% of the patients in group 2 (P < .05).

Conclusions: We conclude that in medical patients requiring mechanical ventilation, there is a higher in-hospital survival rate in ICU-ventilated patients as compared with ventilated patients managed on the medical wards. In addition, ICU provides a better monitoring associated with less endotracheal tube-related complications and more active ventilatory management.

Citing Articles

Predictive factors for successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in the internal medicine department.

Cohen G, Bergman I, Atamna A, Elis A Intern Emerg Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39907916 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-025-03860-3.


Epidemiology of sepsis in a Japanese administrative database.

Imaeda T, Oami T, Takahashi N, Saito D, Higashi A, Nakada T Acute Med Surg. 2023; 10(1):e890.

PMID: 37841963 PMC: 10570497. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.890.


The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Statement on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).

Joynt G, Gopalan P, Argent A, Chetty S, Wise R, Lai V South Afr J Crit Care. 2023; 35(1b).

PMID: 37719327 PMC: 10503494. DOI: 10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35.i1b.383.


Comparing Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Units and General Wards: A Comprehensive Analysis.

Maluangnon C, Kanogpotjananont P, Tongyoo S Int J Gen Med. 2023; 16:3779-3787.

PMID: 37649854 PMC: 10464897. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S422791.


Where internal medical patients receive intensive interventions: results from a tertiary-care hospital in Israel.

Leibner G, Brammli-Greenberg S, Katz D, Esayag Y, Kaufman N, Rose A Isr J Health Policy Res. 2023; 12(1):22.

PMID: 37226205 PMC: 10206337. DOI: 10.1186/s13584-023-00570-z.