» Articles » PMID: 17363699

Autonomic Nerve Stimulation Reverses Ventricular Repolarization Sequence in Rabbit Hearts

Overview
Journal Circ Res
Date 2007 Mar 17
PMID 17363699
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sympathetic activity and spatial dispersion of repolarization (DOR) have been implicated as mechanisms that promote arrhythmia vulnerability; yet there are no direct measurements of the effects of autonomic nerve stimulation on DOR. Rabbit hearts were perfused in a Langendorff apparatus with full sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation and were optically mapped to measure action potential durations and DOR (apex-base) over the left ventricles. DOR was measured under sinus rhythm, during bilateral sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS) and right and/or left vagus nerve stimulation and was compared with DOR during isoproterenol (100 nmol/L) or acetylcholine (1 micromol/L) infusion. In sinus rhythm, repolarization started at the apex and systematically progressed toward the base. SNS (10 to 15 Hz) increased DOR by 29% (from Deltaaction potential duration=17+/-0.7 to -22+/-1.6 ms, n=6) and reversed DOR as the direction of repolarization from apex-->base in sinus rhythm shifted to base-->apex in 5 to 15 seconds after SNS. DOR flipped back to its sinus rhythm DOR pattern 115+/-15 seconds after the interruption of SNS. During right or left vagus nerve stimulation, there was no change in the direction of DOR, but bilateral vagus nerve stimulation increased and reversed DOR to base-->apex direction. Infusion of isoproterenol or acetylcholine increased DOR but did not alter the direction of repolarization sequences. These findings demonstrate that bilateral autonomic activity (SNS or vagus nerve stimulation) cause reversible shifts of apex-base DOR and that the spatial heterogeneities of autonomic effects on the ventricles are most likely attributable to a greater innervation at the base than the apex of the heart.

Citing Articles

Mechanism of Ventricular Tachycardia Occurring in Chronic Myocardial Infarction Scar.

Donahue J, Chrispin J, Ajijola O Circ Res. 2024; 134(3):328-342.

PMID: 38300981 PMC: 10836816. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.321553.


Autonomic neuro-cardiac profile of electrical, structural and neuronal remodeling in myocardial infarction-induced heart failure.

Chin S, Allen E, Brack K, Ng G J Mol Cell Cardiol Plus. 2023; 5:100044.

PMID: 37745157 PMC: 10512199. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmccpl.2023.100044.


The role of β-adrenergic stimulation in QT interval adaptation to heart rate during stress test.

Perez C, Cebollada R, Mountris K, Martinez J, Laguna P, Pueyo E PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280901.

PMID: 36701349 PMC: 9879473. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280901.


Whole-heart multiparametric optical imaging reveals sex-dependent heterogeneity in cAMP signaling and repolarization kinetics.

Caldwell J, Lee I, Ngo L, Wang L, Bahriz S, Xu B Sci Adv. 2023; 9(3):eadd5799.

PMID: 36662864 PMC: 9858506. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add5799.


Acetylcholine Reduces L-Type Calcium Current without Major Changes in Repolarization of Canine and Human Purkinje and Ventricular Tissue.

Verkerk A, Doszpod I, Mengarelli I, Magyar T, Polyak A, Paszti B Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11).

PMID: 36428555 PMC: 9687254. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112987.


References
1.
Sanguinetti M, Jurkiewicz N, Scott A, Siegl P . Isoproterenol antagonizes prolongation of refractory period by the class III antiarrhythmic agent E-4031 in guinea pig myocytes. Mechanism of action. Circ Res. 1991; 68(1):77-84. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.68.1.77. View

2.
London B, Baker L, Petkova-Kirova P, Nerbonne J, Choi B, Salama G . Dispersion of repolarization and refractoriness are determinants of arrhythmia phenotype in transgenic mice with long QT. J Physiol. 2006; 578(Pt 1):115-29. PMC: 2075135. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.122622. View

3.
Fish J, Di Diego J, Nesterenko V, Antzelevitch C . Epicardial activation of left ventricular wall prolongs QT interval and transmural dispersion of repolarization: implications for biventricular pacing. Circulation. 2004; 109(17):2136-42. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127423.75608.A4. View

4.
Nearing B, Verrier R . Modified moving average analysis of T-wave alternans to predict ventricular fibrillation with high accuracy. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002; 92(2):541-9. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00592.2001. View

5.
Magnano A, Holleran S, Ramakrishnan R, Reiffel J, Bloomfield D . Autonomic modulation of the u wave during sympathomimetic stimulation and vagal inhibition in normal individuals. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004; 27(11):1484-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00665.x. View