» Articles » PMID: 17361006

Evidence for Human Orosensory (taste?) Sensitivity to Free Fatty Acids

Overview
Journal Chem Senses
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2007 Mar 16
PMID 17361006
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests dietary fatty acids (FAs) may be sensed in the oral cavity. However, the effective cues have not been characterized. In particular, influences from other sensory cues have hampered identification of an independent gustatory contribution. Experiment 1 examined techniques to minimize the formation of FA oxidation products and improve the homogeneity of water/lipid emulsions to be used as stimuli in Experiment 2, a psychophysical study to determine FA detection thresholds in humans. Through sonication of chilled samples held in polypropylene labware and the addition of 0.01% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, calcium disodium salt, homogenous emulsions of unoxidized linoleic and oleic FAs were obtained. Spectrophotometric analysis revealed no oxidation product formation over a 24-h period. Coupled with these techniques, a masking approach was used to minimize other sensory cues imparted from linoleic, oleic, and stearic FAs. Concentration ranges from 0.00028% to 5% (w/v) were prepared in mixtures with 5% mineral oil (w/v) and 5% gum acacia (w/v) to mask lubricity and viscosity effects, respectively. Testing was conducted under red light with nares blocked to eliminate visual and olfactory cues. Oral rinses with 20 ppm capsaicin were administered to desensitize participants to selected irritation effects prior to remeasuring linoleic acid detection thresholds. To determine if the effective stimulus was an oxidation product, oxidized linoleic acid was included among the test stimuli. Detection thresholds were obtained using a 3-alternative, forced-choice ascending-concentration presentation procedure. The mean detection threshold for linoleic acid pre-desensitization was 0.034 +/- 0.008%, for linoleic acid post-desensitization was 0.032 +/- 0.007%, for oleic 0.022 +/- 0.003%, for stearic 0.032 +/- 0.005%, and oxidized linoleic 0.025 +/- 0.005%. The results suggest that linoleic, oleic, stearic, and oxidized linoleic acids are detectable in the oral cavity of humans with minimal input from the olfactory, capsaicin, and viscosity-assessing tactile systems.

Citing Articles

Dose-related effects of intraduodenal quinine on plasma glucose, glucoregulatory hormones and gastric emptying of a nutrient drink, and energy intake, in men with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, randomised, crossover study.

Bitarafan V, Anjom-Shoae J, Rezaie P, Fitzgerald P, Lange K, Horowitz M Diabetologia. 2024; .

PMID: 39690248 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06344-9.


Oral/taste sensitivity to non-esterified long-chain fatty acids with varying degrees of unsaturation.

Kim M, Kim S, Lee H Food Sci Biotechnol. 2024; 33(3):599-606.

PMID: 38274177 PMC: 10805736. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-023-01502-y.


Effects of Quinine on the Glycaemic Response to, and Gastric Emptying of, a Mixed-Nutrient Drink in Females and Males.

Rezaie P, Bitarafan V, Rose B, Lange K, Mohammadpour Z, Rehfeld J Nutrients. 2023; 15(16).

PMID: 37630774 PMC: 10459881. DOI: 10.3390/nu15163584.


Orlistat mouth rinse: Using the tongue to deliver antiobesity medication in a double-blind randomized crossover pilot trial.

Primeaux S, Dubin R, Greenway F Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023; 25(8):2236-2242.

PMID: 37132340 PMC: 10330229. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15101.


Interactions between Beer Compounds and Human Salivary Proteins: Insights toward Astringency and Bitterness Perception.

Goncalves L, Jesus M, Brandao E, Magalhaes P, Mateus N, de Freitas V Molecules. 2023; 28(6).

PMID: 36985492 PMC: 10053927. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28062522.