» Articles » PMID: 17360625

Near-native Structure Refinement Using in Vacuo Energy Minimization

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Mar 16
PMID 17360625
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the greatest shortcomings of macromolecular energy minimization and molecular dynamics techniques is that they generally do not preserve the native structure of proteins as observed by x-ray crystallography. This deformation of the native structure means that these methods are not generally used to refine structures produced by homology-modeling techniques. Here, we use a database of 75 proteins to test the ability of a variety of popular molecular mechanics force fields to maintain the native structure. Minimization from the native structure is a weak test of potential energy functions: It is complemented by a much stronger test in which the same methods are compared for their ability to attract a near-native decoy protein structure toward the native structure. We use a powerfully convergent energy-minimization method and show that, of the traditional molecular mechanics potentials tested, only one showed a modest net improvement over a large data set of structurally diverse proteins. A smooth, differentiable knowledge-based pairwise atomic potential performs better on this test than traditional potential functions. This work is expected to have important implications for protein structure refinement, homology modeling, and structure prediction.

Citing Articles

Whole genome sequencing identifies novel mutations in malaria parasites resistant to artesunate (ATN) and to ATN + mefloquine combination.

Cassiano G, Martinelli A, Mottin M, Neves B, Andrade C, Ferreira P Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1353057.

PMID: 38495651 PMC: 10940360. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1353057.


Mimetic Neural Networks: A Unified Framework for Protein Design and Folding.

Eliasof M, Boesen T, Haber E, Keasar C, Treister E Front Bioinform. 2022; 2:715006.

PMID: 36304270 PMC: 9580911. DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.715006.


Estimation of model accuracy by a unique set of features and tree-based regressor.

Bitton M, Keasar C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):14074.

PMID: 35982086 PMC: 9388490. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17097-z.


Molecular Modeling of Subtype-Specific Tat Protein Signatures to Predict Tat-TAR Interactions That May Be Involved in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders.

Williams M, Cloete R Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:866611.

PMID: 35464972 PMC: 9021916. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.866611.


AHSA1 is a promising therapeutic target for cellular proliferation and proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma.

Gu C, Wang Y, Zhang L, Qiao L, Sun S, Shao M J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 41(1):11.

PMID: 34991674 PMC: 8734095. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-021-02220-1.


References
1.
Krieger E, Darden T, Nabuurs S, Finkelstein A, Vriend G . Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: force-field parameterization in crystal space. Proteins. 2004; 57(4):678-83. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20251. View

2.
Service R . Structural biology. Structural genomics, round 2. Science. 2005; 307(5715):1554-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.307.5715.1554. View

3.
Furuichi E, Koehl P . Influence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials. Proteins. 1998; 31(2):139-49. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19980501)31:2<139::aid-prot4>3.0.co;2-h. View

4.
Krieger E, Koraimann G, Vriend G . Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA--a self-parameterizing force field. Proteins. 2002; 47(3):393-402. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10104. View

5.
Warme P, Momany F, Rumball S, TUTTLE R, Scheraga H . Computation of structures of homologous proteins. Alpha-lactalbumin from lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1974; 13(4):768-82. DOI: 10.1021/bi00701a020. View