» Articles » PMID: 17360283

Mitotic Recombination Counteracts the Benefits of Genetic Segregation

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Mar 16
PMID 17360283
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ubiquity of sexual reproduction despite its cost has lead to an extensive body of research on the evolution and maintenance of sexual reproduction. Previous work has suggested that sexual reproduction can substantially speed up the rate of adaptation in diploid populations, because sexual populations are able to produce the fittest homozygous genotype by segregation and mating of heterozygous individuals. In contrast, asexual populations must wait for two rare mutational events, one producing a heterozygous carrier and the second converting a heterozygous to a homozygous carrier, before a beneficial mutation can become fixed. By avoiding this additional waiting time, it was shown that the benefits of segregation could overcome a twofold cost of sex. This previous result ignores mitotic recombination (MR), however. Here, we show that MR significantly hastens the spread of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Indeed, given empirical data on MR, we find that adaptation in asexual populations proceeds as fast as that in sexual populations, especially when beneficial alleles are partially recessive. We conclude that asexual populations can gain most of the benefit of segregation through MR while avoiding the costs associated with sexual reproduction.

Citing Articles

Genome restructuring and lineage diversification of during chronic infection of human hosts.

Montoya M, Wilhoit K, Murray D, Perfect J, Magwene P medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40034768 PMC: 11875314. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.17.25320472.


The dynamics of loss of heterozygosity events in genomes.

Dutta A, Schacherer J EMBO Rep. 2025; 26(3):602-612.

PMID: 39747660 PMC: 11811284. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00353-w.


Upper Bound on the Mutational Burden Imposed by a CRISPR-Cas9 Gene-Drive Element.

Overton M, Guy S, Chen X, Martsul A, Carolino K, Akbari O bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38076841 PMC: 10705488. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.28.569142.


Loss of Heterozygosity and Its Importance in Evolution.

Smukowski Heil C J Mol Evol. 2023; 91(3):369-377.

PMID: 36752826 PMC: 10276065. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-022-10088-8.


Loss-of-heterozygosity facilitates a fitness valley crossing in experimentally evolved multicellular yeast.

Baselga-Cervera B, Gettle N, Travisano M Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1976):20212722.

PMID: 36547392 PMC: 9185828. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2722.


References
1.
Shao C, Deng L, Henegariu O, Liang L, Raikwar N, Sahota A . Mitotic recombination produces the majority of recessive fibroblast variants in heterozygous mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(16):9230-5. PMC: 17762. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9230. View

2.
Holt D, Dreimanis M, Pfeiffer M, Firgaira F, Morley A, Turner D . Interindividual variation in mitotic recombination. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 65(5):1423-7. PMC: 1288296. DOI: 10.1086/302614. View

3.
Puig S, Querol A, Barrio E, Perez-Ortin J . Mitotic recombination and genetic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(5):2057-61. PMC: 101454. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2057-2061.2000. View

4.
Aguilera A, Chavez S, Malagon F . Mitotic recombination in yeast: elements controlling its incidence. Yeast. 2000; 16(8):731-54. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0061(20000615)16:8<731::AID-YEA586>3.0.CO;2-L. View

5.
Chasnov J . Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex. Genetics. 2000; 156(3):1419-25. PMC: 1461328. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.3.1419. View