» Articles » PMID: 17357791

Quiet Stance Control is Affected by Prior Treadmill but Not Overground Locomotion

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2007 Mar 16
PMID 17357791
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Treadmill locomotion is different with respect to overground walking and may require an adapted control mode. The relevant neural computational effort may produce lasting effects encroaching upon the performance of a subsequent postural task. The hypothesis of the present study was that, contrary to overground walking, treadmill walking has effects on quiet stance variables, in the assumption that the imposed locomotor activity is more critical to stance control than natural walking. Nine young subjects performed three different walking sessions: treadmill with eyes closed, treadmill with eyes open, overground walking with eyes open. Body sway area and sway path and the position of the centre of foot pressure during stance were recorded by a dynamometric platform under control, post-walking and post-recovery conditions, alternatively with eyes closed and eyes open. At variance with overground walking, treadmill locomotion produced an effect on body orientation in space during the subsequent stance trials. This consisted in a forward inclination of the body, not accompanied by increased body sway, lasting for a few minutes. Presence or absence of vision during treadmill locomotion did not induce differences in the amplitude or time-course of the post-effect. We argue that body inclination would be the consequence of a change in the postural reference produced by a message arising from treadmill locomotion itself, possibly connected to particularities in the control mode of this type of walking.

Citing Articles

Self-selected speed provides more accurate human gait kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters than overground simulated speed on a treadmill: a cross-sectional study.

Roggio F, Trovato B, Sortino M, Vecchio M, Musumeci G BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):226.

PMID: 39497188 PMC: 11533392. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-01011-3.


Effects of Endurance Training on Motor Signs of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

de Almeida F, Santana V, Corcos D, Ugrinowitsch C, Silva-Batista C Sports Med. 2022; 52(8):1789-1815.

PMID: 35113386 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01650-x.


Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Sozzi S, Nardone A, Schieppati M PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0236702.

PMID: 32735602 PMC: 7394407. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236702.


Effect of Treadmill Training With Eyes Open and Closed on Knee Proprioception, Functional Balance and Mobility in Children With Spastic Diplegia.

El Shemy S Ann Rehabil Med. 2019; 42(6):854-862.

PMID: 30613079 PMC: 6325311. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.6.854.


Gait analysis on force treadmill in children: comparison with results from ground-based force platforms.

Tesio L, Malloggi C, Portinaro N, Catino L, Lovecchio N, Rota V Int J Rehabil Res. 2017; 40(4):315-324.

PMID: 28719477 PMC: 5680992. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000243.


References
1.
Hashiba M . Transient change in standing posture after linear treadmill locomotion. Jpn J Physiol. 1999; 48(6):499-504. DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.48.499. View

2.
Wolpaw J, Tennissen A . Activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity in health and disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24:807-43. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.807. View

3.
Maurer C, Mergner T, Peterka R . Multisensory control of human upright stance. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 171(2):231-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0256-y. View

4.
Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck J, Mondwurf C, Boczek-Funcke A, Johnk K, Deuschl G . Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 105(6):490-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00055-6. View

5.
Schmid M, De Nunzio A, Schieppati M . Trunk muscle proprioceptive input assists steering of locomotion. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 384(1-2):127-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.059. View