» Articles » PMID: 17356966

Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Mar 16
PMID 17356966
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite recommendations, osteoporosis screening rates among women aged 65 years and older remain low. We present results from a clustered, randomized trial evaluating patient mailed reminders, alone and in combination with physician prompts, to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment.

Methods: Primary care clinics (n = 15) were randomized to usual care, mailed reminders alone, or mailed reminders with physician prompts. Study patients were females aged 65-89 years (N = 10,354). Using automated clinical and pharmacy data, information was collected on bone mineral density testing, pharmacy dispensings, and other patient characteristics. Unadjusted/adjusted differences in testing and treatment were assessed using generalized estimating equation approaches.

Results: Osteoporosis screening rates were 10.8% in usual care, 24.1% in mailed reminder, and 28.9% in mailed reminder with physician prompt. Results adjusted for differences at baseline indicated that mailed reminders significantly improved testing rates compared to usual care, and that the addition of prompts further improved testing. This effect increased with patient age. Treatment rates were 5.2% in usual care, 8.4% in mailed reminders, and 9.1% in mailed reminders with prompt. No significant differences were found in treatment rates between those receiving mailed reminders alone or in combination with physician prompts. However, women receiving usual care were significantly less likely to be treated.

Conclusions: The use of mailed reminders, either alone or with physician prompts, can significantly improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates among insured primary care patients (Clinical Trials.gov number NCT00139425).

Citing Articles

Geographical variation in osteoporosis in Australian women: a longitudinal analysis over 23 years.

Jones A, Enticott J, Ebeling P, Mishra G, Teede H, Vincent A Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):106.

PMID: 39496826 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01463-7.


The influence of contrast media on calcium-based imaging of the spine in dual-layer CT.

Rahn S, Skornitzke S, Melzig C, Reiner T, Stiller W, Heussel C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18898.

PMID: 39143146 PMC: 11324893. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69743-3.


Physician-Reported Barriers to Osteoporosis Screening: A Nationwide Survey.

Choksi P, Gay B, Haymart M, Papaleontiou M Endocr Pract. 2023; 29(8):606-611.

PMID: 37156374 PMC: 10526724. DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.05.001.


Engagement in Primary Prevention Program among Rural Veterans With Osteoporosis Risk.

Miller K, McCoy K, Richards C, Seaman A, Solimeo S JBMR Plus. 2022; 6(10):e10682.

PMID: 36248271 PMC: 9549732. DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10682.


Delivering fracture prevention services to rural US veterans through telemedicine: a process evaluation.

Miller K, Steffen M, McCoy K, Cannon G, Seaman A, Anderson Z Arch Osteoporos. 2021; 16(1):27.

PMID: 33566174 PMC: 7875846. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00882-0.


References
1.
Torgerson D, Thomas R, Campbell M, Reid D . Randomized trial of osteoporosis screening. Use of hormone replacement therapy and quality-of-life results. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157(18):2121-5. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.157.18.2121. View

2.
Melton 3rd L, Kan S, Frye M, Wahner H, OFallon W, Riggs B . Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129(5):1000-11. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115204. View

3.
Smith D, Zhou X, Weinberger M, Smith F, McDonald R . Mailed reminders for area-wide influenza immunization: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999; 47(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01893.x. View

4.
Barrett J, Baron J, Karagas M, Beach M . Fracture risk in the U.S. Medicare population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(3):243-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00167-x. View

5.
. Prevention of osteoporosis and fractures. Am Fam Physician. 1999; 60(1):194-202. View