Objective:
To compare the usefulness of three micromanipulative methods at two different stages of pre-embryo development and to assess possible effects on postbiopsy survival and development.
Design:
Four-cell and eight-cell mouse pre-embryos were biopsied using enucleation, aspiration, or extrusion of single blastomeres. After biopsy, pre-embryos were observed for in vitro and in vivo development.
Setting:
Laboratories of The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School.
Patients, Participants:
Only mice were used.
Interventions:
Pre-embryo biopsy, developmental normalcy and pre-embryo transfer were studied.
Main Outcome Measure(s):
Few pre-embryos died as a result of biopsy trauma. High postbiopsy survival rates were associated with normal intrauterine and postnatal development.
Results:
Expanded blastocyst formation rates from four-cell and eight-cell pre-embryos were 94.6%, 96.7% (controls); 80.7%, 89.1% (enucleation); 90.1%, 91.7% (aspiration); 83.1%, 91.5% (extrusion), respectively. Live birth rates at the four-cell stage were slightly lower in the enucleation group than in the blastomere aspiration and extrusion groups or controls (49.2% versus 58.8%, 56.3% and 66.7%, respectively). For the eight-cell stage, there were no differences between the groups. No developmental abnormalities were found in body or organ weights, in neonates or at 3 weeks of age, or in their subsequent ability to reproduce a second generation.
Conclusions:
Biopsy of mouse pre-embryos produces only a small loss of viability because of trauma and permits normal prenatal and postnatal development among surviving pre-embryos.
Citing Articles
Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.
Nakano T, Ammae M, Satoh M, Mizuno S, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y
Reprod Med Biol. 2022; 21(1):e12476.
PMID: 35781920
PMC: 9243298.
DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12476.
A novel trophectoderm biopsy technique for all blastocyst stages.
Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H
Reprod Med Biol. 2022; 21(1):e12418.
PMID: 35386363
PMC: 8967278.
DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12418.
Pre-implantation genetic testing: Past, present, future.
Takeuchi K
Reprod Med Biol. 2021; 20(1):27-40.
PMID: 33488281
PMC: 7812490.
DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12352.
Between innovation and precaution: how did offspring safety considerations play a role in strategies of introducing new reproductive techniques?.
Jans V, Dondorp W, Mastenbroek S, Mertes H, Pennings G, Smeets H
Hum Reprod Open. 2020; 2020(2):hoaa003.
PMID: 32201741
PMC: 7077615.
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa003.
In vitro fertilization (IVF) in mammals: epigenetic and developmental alterations. Scientific and bioethical implications for IVF in humans.
Ventura-Junca P, Irarrazaval I, Rolle A, Gutierrez J, Moreno R, Santos M
Biol Res. 2015; 48:68.
PMID: 26683055
PMC: 4684609.
DOI: 10.1186/s40659-015-0059-y.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Natural Conception: A Comparison of Live Birth Rates in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Associated with Translocation.
Ikuma S, Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takeda S
PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0129958.
PMID: 26083495
PMC: 4470686.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129958.
Effects of Timing on Cell Biopsy from Pre-compacted Morula Stage Bovine Embryos on Subsequent Embryonic Development.
Abolfazl S, Sara B, Hassan N, Ebrahim A, Banafsheh H, Amin B
J Reprod Infertil. 2013; 11(1):25-32.
PMID: 23926477
PMC: 3719275.
Biopsy of embryos produced by in vitro fertilization affects development in C57BL/6 mouse strain.
Sugawara A, Ward M
Theriogenology. 2012; 79(2):234-41.
PMID: 23174776
PMC: 3534949.
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.08.007.
Blastomere removal from cleavage-stage mouse embryos alters steroid metabolism during pregnancy.
Sugawara A, Sato B, Bal E, Collier A, Ward M
Biol Reprod. 2012; 87(1):4, 1-9.
PMID: 22517623
PMC: 3406553.
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.111.097444.
Establishment of a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal diseases.
Luo H, Zhu G, Liu Q, Chen W, Li Z
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2007; 27(3):315-7.
PMID: 17641851
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-007-0325-5.
Successful use of a laser for human embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: report of two cases.
Boada M, Carrera M, De La Iglesia C, Sandalinas M, Barri P, Veiga A
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15(5):302-7.
PMID: 9604764
PMC: 3454754.
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022548612107.
A simplified technique for embryo biopsy: use of the same micropipette for zona drilling and blastomere aspiration.
Chen S, Ho H, Chen H, Chao K, Huang S, Lee T
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997; 14(3):157-61.
PMID: 9090559
PMC: 3454670.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02766133.
Influence of mosaicism on sexing of human preembryos detected by the polymerase chain reaction.
Katagiri Y, Katayama S
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996; 13(7):586-91.
PMID: 8844317
DOI: 10.1007/BF02066613.
Hatching rate: an optimal discriminator for the assessment of single-blastomere biopsy.
Cui K, Verma P, Matthews C
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993; 10(2):157-62.
PMID: 8339021
DOI: 10.1007/BF01207740.
Preimplantation diagnosis.
Goldberg J, Martin M, Lebo R, Pedersen R
West J Med. 1993; 159(3):301-7.
PMID: 8236971
PMC: 1011342.
Cryopreserved mouse embryos can successfully survive biopsy and refreezing.
Snabes M, Cota J, Hughes M
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993; 10(8):513-6.
PMID: 8081088
DOI: 10.1007/BF01204361.