» Articles » PMID: 17346591

Occlusal Contacts with Different Retention Procedures in 1-year Follow-up Period

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2007 Mar 10
PMID 17346591
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this follow-up study was to evaluate the number of contacts in centric occlusion during a 1-year retention period in patients treated with 2 retention procedures and in a control sample.

Methods: Twenty patients received modified wraparound Hawley retainers, and 20 received maxillary Jensen plates with mandibular fixed retainers. These retention patients were compared with a control group of 20 subjects with normal occlusions. Silicone-based impression bites were used to record occlusal contacts. Paired and independent-sample t tests were used to evaluate intragroup and intergroup differences.

Results: Contacts increased in the total arch and the posterior combined (actual/near) during the retention period compared with the control group. In the Hawley retainer group, actual contacts on the second molars (P <.05), near contacts on the premolars (P <.05), and total contacts on the first molars (P <.05) and premolars (P <.01) had statistically significant increases. In the maxillary Jensen plate and mandibular fixed lingual retainer group, the number of actual contacts on the posterior segment increased. Actual contacts on the first molars (P <.01), second molars (P <.01), premolars (P <.05), and canines (P <.05), and total contacts on the first (P <.05) and second (P <.05) molars had statistically significant increases. During the observation period, some slight occlusal changes were seen in the control sample, presumably from growth and development. At the end of the study, during the 1-year follow-up period, no statistically significant occlusal contact differences were observed in the 3 groups.

Conclusions: Retention procedures carried out in this study allowed relative vertical movement of the posterior teeth.

Citing Articles

Occlusal Contact Surface Changes and Occlusal Force Distribution Between Vacuum-Formed Retainers and Other Retainers: A Systematic Review.

Singh S, Mohan R, Jain R, Balasubramaniam A Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e50751.

PMID: 38239549 PMC: 10794790. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50751.


Occlusal Changes with Clear Aligners and the Case Complexity Influence: A Longitudinal Cohort Clinical Study.

Marcelino V, Baptista S, Marcelino S, Paco M, Rocha D, Goncalves M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37240538 PMC: 10219537. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103435.


Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.

Martin C, Littlewood S, Millett D, Doubleday B, Bearn D, Worthington H Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 5:CD002283.

PMID: 37219527 PMC: 10202160. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5.


Computerized dynamic occlusal analysis and its correlation with static characters in post-orthodontic patients using the T-Scan system and the ABO objective grading system.

Wang M, Liu L, Ma X, Jin X, Zhang Z, Jia X BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):312.

PMID: 37217888 PMC: 10204290. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02868-5.


Remote digital monitoring during the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A prospective feasibility study.

Sangalli L, Savoldi F, Dalessandri D, Visconti L, Massetti F, Bonetti S Korean J Orthod. 2022; 52(2):123-130.

PMID: 35321951 PMC: 8964474. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.123.