» Articles » PMID: 17336343

CC12, a High-affinity Ligand for [3H]cimetidine Binding, is an Improgan Antagonist

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2007 Mar 6
PMID 17336343
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Improgan, a chemical congener of cimetidine, is a highly effective non-opioid analgesic when injected into the CNS. Despite extensive characterization, neither the improgan receptor, nor a pharmacological antagonist of improgan has been previously described. Presently, the specific binding of [(3)H]cimetidine (3HCIM) in brain fractions was used to discover 4(5)-((4-iodobenzyl)thiomethyl)-1H-imidazole, which behaved in vivo as the first improgan antagonist. The synthesis and pharmacological properties of this drug (named CC12) are described herein. In rats, CC12 (50-500nmol, i.c.v.) produced dose-dependent inhibition of improgan (200-400nmol) antinociception on the tail flick and hot plate tests. When given alone to rats, CC12 had no effects on nociceptive latencies, or on other observable behavioral or motor functions. Maximal inhibitory effects of CC12 (500nmol) were fully surmounted with a large i.c.v. dose of improgan (800nmol), demonstrating competitive antagonism. In mice, CC12 (200-400nmol, i.c.v.) behaved as a partial agonist, producing incomplete improgan antagonism, but also limited antinociception when given alone. Radioligand binding, receptor autoradiography, and electrophysiology experiments showed that CC12's antagonist properties are not explained by activity at 25 sites relevant to analgesia, including known receptors for cannabinoids, opioids or histamine. The use of CC12 as an improgan antagonist will facilitate the characterization of improgan analgesia. Furthermore, because CC12 was also found presently to inhibit opioid and cannabinoid antinociception, it is suggested that this drug modifies a biochemical mechanism shared by several classes of analgesics. Elucidation of this mechanism will enhance understanding of the biochemistry of pain relief.

Citing Articles

Opioid Analgesia in P450 Gene Cluster Knockout Mice: A Search for Analgesia-Relevant Isoforms.

Hough L, Nalwalk J, Ding X, Scheer N Drug Metab Dispos. 2015; 43(9):1326-30.

PMID: 26109562 PMC: 4538858. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.115.065490.


Cytochrome P450 2C24: Expression, Tissue Distribution, High-Throughput Assay, and Pharmacological Inhibition.

Yang J, VanAlstine M, Phillips J, Wentland M, Hough L Acta Pharm Sin B. 2014; 2(2):137-145.

PMID: 25068100 PMC: 4108250. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2012.02.003.


Deficits in neuronal cytochrome P450 activity attenuate opioid analgesia but not opioid side effects.

Hough L, Nalwalk J, Cleary R, Phillips J, Fang C, Yang W Eur J Pharmacol. 2014; 740:255-62.

PMID: 25062792 PMC: 4147671. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.028.


CC12, a P450/epoxygenase inhibitor, acts in the rat rostral, ventromedial medulla to attenuate morphine antinociception.

Conroy J, Nalwalk J, Phillips J, Hough L Brain Res. 2013; 1499:1-11.

PMID: 23298831 PMC: 3570688. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.030.


Brain P450 epoxygenase activity is required for the antinociceptive effects of improgan, a nonopioid analgesic.

Hough L, Nalwalk J, Yang J, Conroy J, VanAlstine M, Yang W Pain. 2011; 152(4):878-887.

PMID: 21316152 PMC: 3065546. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.001.


References
1.
Nelson D, Zeldin D, Hoffman S, Maltais L, Wain H, Nebert D . Comparison of cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes from the mouse and human genomes, including nomenclature recommendations for genes, pseudogenes and alternative-splice variants. Pharmacogenetics. 2004; 14(1):1-18. DOI: 10.1097/00008571-200401000-00001. View

2.
Zeitz K, Guy N, Malmberg A, Dirajlal S, Martin W, Sun L . The 5-HT3 subtype of serotonin receptor contributes to nociceptive processing via a novel subset of myelinated and unmyelinated nociceptors. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(3):1010-9. PMC: 6758503. View

3.
Happe H, Bylund D, Murrin L . Agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography: optimization for high sensitivity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001; 422(1-3):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01043-3. View

4.
Gharagozlou P, Demirci H, Clark J, Lameh J . Activity of opioid ligands in cells expressing cloned mu opioid receptors. BMC Pharmacol. 2003; 3:1. PMC: 140036. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2210-3-1. View

5.
Breivogel C, Childers S . Cannabinoid agonist signal transduction in rat brain: comparison of cannabinoid agonists in receptor binding, G-protein activation, and adenylyl cyclase inhibition. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000; 295(1):328-36. View