» Articles » PMID: 17334919

Response of the Aphid Parasitoid Aphidius Funebris to Volatiles from Undamaged and Aphid-infested Centaurea Nigra

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Mar 6
PMID 17334919
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two issues have hindered the understanding of the ecology and evolution of volatile-mediated tritrophic interactions: few studies have addressed noncrop systems; and few statistical techniques have been applied that are suitable for the analysis of complex volatile blends. In this paper, we addressed both of these issues by studying the noncrop system involving the plant Centaurea nigra, the specialist aphid Uroleucon jaceae, and the parasitoid Aphidius funebris. In a Y-tube olfactometer, A. funebris was attracted to the odor from undamaged C. nigra, but preferred the plant-host complex (PHC) after 3 d of feeding by 200 U. jaceae over the undamaged plant, but not after three or 5 d of feeding by 50 U. jaceae. When aphids were removed, the initial preference for the damaged plant remained, but the final preference was not greater than for the undamaged plant. No qualitative differences were detected between the headspaces of C. nigra and the C. nigra-U. jaceae PHC. For quantitative analysis, we used a compositional approach, which treats each compound produced as part of a blend, and not as a compound released in isolation, thus allowing analysis of the relative contribution of each compound to the blend as a whole. With this approach, subtle increases and decreases of some green leaf volatiles and monoterpenoids on the third day of aphid infestation were detected. Mechanically damaged C. nigra had a volatile profile that differed from undamaged C. nigra and the PHC. One and 10 ng of (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, and 10 or 100 ng of 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one were attractive to the parasitoid when placed in solution on filter paper. A. funebris appears to be using a combination of chemical cues to locate host-infested plants.

Citing Articles

Analysis of apocarotenoid volatiles from lettuce () induced by insect herbivores and characterization of gene.

Meng K, Eldar-Liebreich M, Nawade B, Yahyaa M, Shaltiel-Harpaz L, Coll M 3 Biotech. 2023; 13(3):94.

PMID: 36845074 PMC: 9943837. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-023-03511-4.


Aphids Facing Their Parasitoids: A First Look at How Chemical Signals May Make Higher Densities of the Pea Aphid Less Attractive to the Parasitoid .

Ismail M, Zanolli P, Muratori F, Hance T Insects. 2021; 12(10).

PMID: 34680647 PMC: 8538517. DOI: 10.3390/insects12100878.


Volatile and Non-Volatile Organic Compounds Stimulate Oviposition by Aphidophagous Predators.

Riddick E Insects. 2020; 11(10).

PMID: 33050465 PMC: 7599863. DOI: 10.3390/insects11100683.


The Aphid-Transmitted Differentially Affects Volatiles Emission and Subsequent Vector Behavior in Two Plants.

Claudel P, Chesnais Q, Fouche Q, Krieger C, Halter D, Bogaert F Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(8).

PMID: 30087282 PMC: 6121887. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082316.


Aphid Parasitoid Mothers Don't Always Know Best through the Whole Host Selection Process.

Chesnais Q, Ameline A, Doury G, Le Roux V, Couty A PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0135661.

PMID: 26270046 PMC: 4535949. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135661.


References
1.
Mattiacci L, Rocca B, Scascighini N, dAlessandro M, Hern A, Dorn S . Systemically induced plant volatiles emitted at the time of "danger". J Chem Ecol. 2002; 27(11):2233-52. DOI: 10.1023/a:1012278804105. View

2.
Bostock R . Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005; 43:545-80. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095505. View

3.
Bukovinszky T, Gols R, Posthumus M, Vet L, van Lenteren J . Variation in plant volatiles and attraction of the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum (Hellén). J Chem Ecol. 2005; 31(3):461-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-2019-4. View

4.
Hoballah M, Turlings T . The role of fresh versus old leaf damage in the attraction of parasitic wasps to herbivore-induced maize volatiles. J Chem Ecol. 2005; 31(9):2003-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-6074-7. View

5.
Kessler A, Baldwin I . Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002; 53:299-328. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135207. View