» Articles » PMID: 17333260

Duplicated Abd-B Class Genes in Medaka HoxAa and HoxAb Clusters Exhibit Differential Expression Patterns in Pectoral Fin Buds

Overview
Journal Dev Genes Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Mar 3
PMID 17333260
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hox genes form clusters. Invertebrates and Amphioxus have only one hox cluster, but in vertebrates, they are multiple, i.e., four in the basal teleost fish Polyodon and tetrapods (HoxA, B, C, D), but seven or eight in common teleosts. We earlier completely sequenced the entire hox gene loci in medaka fish, showing a total of 46 hox genes to be encoded in seven clusters (hoxAa, Ab, Ba, Bb, Ca, Da, Db). Among them, hoxAa, hoxAb and hoxDa clusters are presumed to be important for fin-to-limb evolution because of their key role in forelimb and pectoral fin development. In the present study, we compared genome organization and nucleotide sequences of the hoxAa and hoxAb clusters to these of tetrapod HoxA clusters, and found greater similarity in hoxAa case. We then analyzed expression of Abd-B family genes in the clusters. In the trunk, those from the hoxAa cluster, i.e., hoxA9a, hoxA10a, hoxA11a and hoxA13a, were expressed in a manner keeping the colinearity rule of the hox expression as those of tetrapods, while those from the hoxAb cluster, i.e., hoxA9b, hoxA10b, hoxA11b and hoxA13b, were not. In the pectoral fins, the hoxAa cluster was expressed in split domains and did not obey the rule. By contrast, those from the hoxAb and hoxDa clusters were expressed in a manner keeping the rule, i.e., an ancestral pattern similar to those of tetrapods. It is plausible that this differential expression of the two clusters is caused by changes occurred in global control regions after cluster duplications.

Citing Articles

Developmental constraints on fin diversity.

Enny A, Flaherty K, Mori S, Turner N, Nakamura T Dev Growth Differ. 2020; 62(5):311-325.

PMID: 32396685 PMC: 7383993. DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12670.


The sterlet sturgeon genome sequence and the mechanisms of segmental rediploidization.

Du K, Stock M, Kneitz S, Klopp C, Woltering J, Adolfi M Nat Ecol Evol. 2020; 4(6):841-852.

PMID: 32231327 PMC: 7269910. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1166-x.


Fin-fold development in paddlefish and catshark and implications for the evolution of the autopod.

Tulenko F, Massey J, Holmquist E, Kigundu G, Thomas S, Smith S Proc Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1855).

PMID: 28539509 PMC: 5454254. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2780.


Evolution of Hoxa11 regulation in vertebrates is linked to the pentadactyl state.

Kherdjemil Y, Lalonde R, Sheth R, Dumouchel A, de Martino G, Pineault K Nature. 2016; 539(7627):89-92.

PMID: 27706137 PMC: 5558051. DOI: 10.1038/nature19813.


HoxD expression in the fin-fold compartment of basal gnathostomes and implications for paired appendage evolution.

Tulenko F, Augustus G, Massey J, Sims S, Mazan S, Davis M Sci Rep. 2016; 6:22720.

PMID: 26940624 PMC: 4778128. DOI: 10.1038/srep22720.


References
1.
Sordino P, Duboule D, Kondo T . Zebrafish Hoxa and Evx-2 genes: cloning, developmental expression and implications for the functional evolution of posterior Hox genes. Mech Dev. 1996; 59(2):165-75. DOI: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00587-4. View

2.
Krumlauf R . Evolution of the vertebrate Hox homeobox genes. Bioessays. 1992; 14(4):245-52. DOI: 10.1002/bies.950140408. View

3.
Naruse K, Fukamachi S, Mitani H, Kondo M, Matsuoka T, Kondo S . A detailed linkage map of medaka, Oryzias latipes: comparative genomics and genome evolution. Genetics. 2000; 154(4):1773-84. PMC: 1461045. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1773. View

4.
Scott M . Vertebrate homeobox gene nomenclature. Cell. 1992; 71(4):551-3. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90588-4. View

5.
Dietrich S, Brohmann H, Bladt F, Yamaai T, Lumsden A, Brand-Saberi B . The role of SF/HGF and c-Met in the development of skeletal muscle. Development. 1999; 126(8):1621-9. DOI: 10.1242/dev.126.8.1621. View