Immediate and Six-month Space Changes After Premature Loss of a Primary Maxillary First Molar
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Premature loss of primary maxillary first molars has been associated with a number of consequences (such as tipping of the first permanent molar). The aim of the authors' study was to investigate dental-arch space problems arising as a result of premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar.
Methods: This study was composed of 19 children who experienced unilateral premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar. The authors used each patient's intact contralateral arch segment as a control. The authors obtained maxillary dental study casts two or three days after the tooth was extracted, as well as six months later.
Results: The D + E space from the extraction side six months after removal of the tooth (mean +/- standard deviation, 15.62 +/- 1.13 millimeters) was significantly smaller than the space on the control side (16.88 +/- 1.12 mm) and the initial D + E space (16.70 +/- 0.69 mm). The authors found a significantly shorter arch length (25.47 +/- 1.58 mm) and larger intercanine width (31.29 +/- 2.49 mm) six months after the tooth was extracted compared with the initial arch length (25.66 +/- 1.64 mm) and intercanine width (30.42 +/- 2.64 mm).
Conclusions: The early space changes to the maxillary arch subsequent to premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar are primarily distal drift of the primary canines toward the extraction space and palatal migration of the maxillary incisors. Although 1 mm of space was lost, which is statistically significant, this is not likely to be of sufficient clinical significance to warrant use of a space maintainer. If palatal movement appears to be needed, the dentist should consider use of a palatal arch rather than a band-and-loop maintainer.
Clinical Implications: The effects of space maintainers need to be re-evaluated in cases of unilateral premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar.
Orthodontic Space Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Clinical Review.
Koaban A, Alotaibi S, Abu Nakha K, Bin Huraib S, Alhassan M, Rubayan A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76026.
PMID: 39835004 PMC: 11743602. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76026.
Warkhandkar A, Habib L Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e42442.
PMID: 37637675 PMC: 10449235. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42442.
Zhao J, Jin H, Li X, Qin X BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):430.
PMID: 37380944 PMC: 10304618. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03111-x.
Heidari A, Mokhtari S, Hamrah M, Tavana Z, Heydarigoojani M, Tavana N Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:7604144.
PMID: 35392262 PMC: 8983192. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7604144.
Mosharrafian S, Baghalian A, Hamrah M, Kargar M Int J Dent. 2022; 2021:3967164.
PMID: 34987584 PMC: 8723840. DOI: 10.1155/2021/3967164.