» Articles » PMID: 17331806

Incidence of Gastroenterostomy Stenosis in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Using 21- or 25-mm Circular Stapler: a Randomized Prospective Blinded Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2007 Mar 3
PMID 17331806
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure performed in the United States today. The most common early complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y is stenosis. No randomized studies have compared the effect of the different staplers on the incidence of stenosis or on long-term weight loss. We compared the anastomoses performed with the two sizes of circular stapler in common use.

Methods: A total of 200 patients were randomized to undergo 21-mm (n = 100) or 25-mm (n = 100) circular stapled gastroenterostomy after induction of anesthesia. No other differences were allowed in the operative technique. Stenosis was defined as patient complaints of dysphagia leading to endoscopy within 10 weeks of surgery, in which a 9-mm diameter endoscope would not pass through the gastroenterostomy without dilation.

Results: Of the 200 patients, 19 patients in the 21-mm group and 8 in the 25-mm group underwent endoscopy for symptoms (P = 0.027). Of the 19 and 8 patients, 17 and 7, respectively, had measurable stenosis at endoscopy (p = 0.035). Patients with a 21-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 4.8 +/- 1.2 weeks after surgery, and those with a 25-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 8.9 +/- 3.8 weeks postoperatively (P <0.001).

Conclusions: We found a significant difference in the stenosis rate between the 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled anastomoses in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The 21-mm staplers led to significantly more endoscopies than did the 25-mm staplers. Symptoms leading to endoscopy occurred significantly later with use of a 25-mm stapler than after a 21-mm stapler.

Citing Articles

Metabolic/bariatric surgery optimization: a position statement by Arabic association for the study of diabetes and metabolism (AASD).

Soliman A, Magd Eldin Saleem H, El Meligi A, Naguib M, Sobh Mohamed R, Abdelaziz G Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025; 17(1):37.

PMID: 39881371 PMC: 11776182. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-024-01564-w.


Integrated Insights into Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Improving Life Quality and Reducing Mortality in Obesity.

Marin R, Radu A, Negru P, Radu A, Negru D, Aron R Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39858996 PMC: 11767230. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010014.


Navigating Bariatric Surgery: Understanding and Managing Short-Term and Long-Term Complications.

Tsenteradze T, Fayyaz F, Ekhator C, Ahmed I, Oliveira Souza Lima S, Daher O Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e48580.

PMID: 38084166 PMC: 10710376. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48580.


Evaluating outcomes among surgeons who changed their technique for gastric bypass: a state-wide analysis from 2011 to 2021.

Hider A, Johanson H, Bonham A, Ghaferi A, Finks J, Ehlers A Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(11):8464-8472.

PMID: 37740112 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10434-x.


Effect of Circular Stapler Diameter on Anastomotic Leakage Rate and Stenosis After Open Total Gastrectomy With Esophagojejunostomy: A Substantive Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Series.

Mittelstadt A, Reitberger H, Fleischmann J, ElShafei M, Brunner M, Anthuber A Ann Surg Open. 2023; 3(3):e195.

PMID: 37601147 PMC: 10431426. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000195.