» Articles » PMID: 17326823

Likely Country of Origin in Publications on Randomised Controlled Trials and Controlled Clinical Trials During the Last 60 Years

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2007 Mar 1
PMID 17326823
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The number of publications on clinical trials is unknown as well as the countries publishing most trial reports. To try to examine these questions we performed an ecological study.

Methods: We searched the 454,449 records on publications in The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005 (CD-ROM version) for possible country of origin. We inspected a random sample of 906 records for information on country and type of trial.

Results: There was an exponential growth of publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials since 1946, but the growth seems to have seized since 2000. We identified the possible country of origin of 210,974 publications (46.4%). The USA is leading with about 46,789 publications followed by UK, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, and France. Sweden becomes the leader with 891 publications per million inhabitants during the last 60 years followed by Denmark (n = 864), New Zealand (n = 791), Finland (n = 781), the Netherlands (n = 570), Switzerland (n = 547), and Norway (n = 543). In depth assessment of the random sample backed these findings.

Conclusion: Many records lacked country of origin, even after the additional scrutiny. The number of publications on clinical trials increased exponentially until the turn of the century. Rather small, democratic, and wealthy countries take the lead when the number of publications on clinical trials is calculated based on million inhabitants. If all countries produced the same number of trials as these countries, this could mean thousands of new effective treatments during the next 60 years.

Citing Articles

Quality of Abstracts Reporting in Periodontal Randomized Controlled Trials: A Descriptive Analysis.

Alharbi F, Gufran K, Ahmed M, Alghabban R, Almohammadi M, Almutairi A J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 4):S3322-S3328.

PMID: 39927039 PMC: 11805245. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_761_24.


Quality Assessment and Relevant Clinical Impact of Randomized Controlled Trials of Varicocele: Next Step to Good-Quality Randomized Controlled Trial of Varicocele Treatment.

Kim K, Chung J, Park H, Shin W, Lee B, Lee S World J Mens Health. 2021; 40(2):290-298.

PMID: 34169678 PMC: 8987142. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.200167.


Creating a database of internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis.

Brice A, Price A, Burls A Digit Health. 2018; 1:2055207615617854.

PMID: 29942546 PMC: 5999056. DOI: 10.1177/2055207615617854.


Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.

Yoneoka D, Ota E PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173526.

PMID: 28278271 PMC: 5344454. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173526.


Future perspectives for surgical research in Germany.

Diener M, Menger M, Jahne J, Saeger H, Klar E Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014; 399(3):253-62.

PMID: 24615143 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1178-6.


References
1.
McDonald S . Improving access to the international coverage of reports of controlled trials in electronic databases: a search of the Australasian Medical Index. Health Info Libr J. 2002; 19(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1046/j.0265-6647.2001.00359.x. View

2.
Chan A, Altman D . Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet. 2005; 365(9465):1159-62. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71879-1. View

3.
Grossi F, Belvedere O, Rosso R . Geography of clinical cancer research publications from 1995 to 1999. Eur J Cancer. 2002; 39(1):106-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00239-3. View

4.
Chalmers I . Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA. 1990; 263(10):1405-8. View

5.
Gluud L . Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(6):493-501. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj069. View