» Articles » PMID: 17325824

Nonpalpable Testes: is There a Relationship Between Ultrasonographic and Operative Findings?

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2007 Feb 28
PMID 17325824
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ultrasonography (US) as a diagnostic tool in the work-up of boys with nonpalpable testes (NPT) is still controversial.

Objective: To evaluate the relation between US and operative findings in boys with NPT.

Materials And Methods: During a 7-year period we saw 135 boys with 152 NPT. All were examined by the referring physician or a paediatric surgeon, underwent US examination, and were then re-examined afterwards by a specialist. Finally, all boys were surgically explored for testicular position.

Results: US located 103 NPT (68%), 16 within the abdomen and 87 in the inguinal canal. With knowledge of the US result, 37 testes were palpable on re-examination. The sensitivity of US was 97% for inguinal and 48% for abdominal viable testes. Of the 49 testes (32%) missed by US, 16 were viable in either the abdominal (n=14) or the inguinal (n=2) position.

Conclusion: All boys with presumed NPT should be referred to a specialist. US is useful to determine localization of NPT, which facilitates planning the surgical procedure. An inguinal exploration is called for when US identifies the testis in the inguinal canal. Because the sensitivity of US for viable abdominal testes is only 48%, we now always perform laparoscopic exploration when US is negative.

Citing Articles

The role of the radiologist in the evaluation of male infertility: recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology-Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) for scrotal imaging.

Lotti F, Studniarek M, Balasa C, Belfield J, De Visschere P, Freeman S Eur Radiol. 2024; 35(2):752-766.

PMID: 39083089 PMC: 11782349. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10964-5.


Comparison of conventional Doppler imaging techniques and superb microvascular imaging in determination of vascularization in undescended testes.

Ates F, Sivri M, Durmaz M, Sekmenli T, Gunduz M, Ciftci I J Ultrason. 2023; 23(93):e66-e72.

PMID: 37520746 PMC: 10379854. DOI: 10.15557/jou.2023.0013.


To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI in localization of non-palpable undescended testes taking laparoscopic findings as the gold standard: A cross-sectional study from Pakistan.

Fazal K, Hussain S, Khan F, Ullah I, Junaid Tahir M, Mehmood Q Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 73:103161.

PMID: 35079354 PMC: 8767264. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103161.


Impalpable Testis: Evaluation of Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures and Our Treatment Protocol.

Fratric I, Sarac D, Antic J, dermanov M, Jokic R Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:3143412.

PMID: 30112376 PMC: 6077678. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3143412.


Treatment of impalpable testis - one clinic's experience.

Osemlak P, Zadkowski T, Rogowski B, Cielecki C, Wieczorek A, Wozniak M Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017; 12(2):166-171.

PMID: 28694903 PMC: 5502339. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.67482.


References
1.
Pike M, Chilvers C, Peckham M . Effect of age at orchidopexy on risk of testicular cancer. Lancet. 1986; 1(8492):1246-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91389-9. View

2.
HINMAN Jr F . Survey: localization and operation for nonpalpable testes. Urology. 1987; 30(3):193-8. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90230-5. View

3.
Gearhart J, Jeffs R . Diagnostic maneuvers in cryptorchidism. Semin Urol. 1988; 6(2):79-83. View

4.
Friedland G, Chang P . The role of imaging in the management of the impalpable undescended testis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 151(6):1107-11. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.6.1107. View

5.
Malone P, Guiney E . A comparison between ultrasonography and laparoscopy in localising the impalpable undescended testis. Br J Urol. 1985; 57(2):185-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1985.tb06418.x. View