» Articles » PMID: 17322603

A Randomized, Crossover, Open Label Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Xalatan in Comparison with Generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in Subjects with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2007 Feb 27
PMID 17322603
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of Xalatan with generic latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OH).

Materials And Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, open label, crossover, two period comparative study. At the baseline visit, subjects were randomized to two groups. Group A received Xalatan for weeks 1-12 followed by Latoprost for weeks 13-24. Group B received Latoprost for weeks 1-12 followed by Xalatan for weeks 13-24.

Results: 30 subjects were recruited, 12 in Group A and 18 in Group B. In subjects administered Xalatan, intraocular pressure (IOP) showed a greater decrease (P < 0.001) from 23.64 +/- 3.13 mmHg at baseline to 14.29 +/- 1.61 mmHg at week 12 (fall of 9.35 +/- 3.55 mmHg, 38.66% +/- 10.29) than that seen in the Latoprost group (22.74 +/- 2.47 mmHg to 16.98 +/- 2.49 mmHg, fall of 5.76 +/- 1.41 mmHg; 25.42% +/- 5.98). In period 2 when subjects were crossed over to Xalatan from Latoprost, there was a further fall from 16.98 +/- 2.49 mmHg to 16.09 +/- 1.49 at week 24 (fall of 0.89 +/- 1.59 mmHg; 4.3% +/- 8.76). However, when subjects were crossed over to Latoprost from Xalatan, the IOP rose from 14.29 +/- 1.61 mmHg to 15.36 +/- 1.71 mmHg at week 24 (8.86% +/- 17.76). There was no significant difference in incidence of conjunctival hyperemia or any other adverse events in both the groups.

Conclusion: The magnitude of IOP lowering in patients with POAG and OH with Xalatan and Latoprost is different. In our study, the IOP lowering with Xalatan was higher than that with Latoprost.

Citing Articles

Effects of the pharmaceutical formulation of topical medications on corneal epithelial healing after phototherapeutic keratectomy.

Takanashi N, Haruki T, Miyazaki D, Inoue Y Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023; 67(4):424-430.

PMID: 37341848 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-023-01004-8.


Therapeutic applications of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology for the treatment of ocular diseases.

Sundaresan Y, Yacoub S, Kodati B, Amankwa C, Raola A, Zode G FEBS J. 2023; 290(22):5248-5269.

PMID: 36877952 PMC: 10480348. DOI: 10.1111/febs.16771.


Reduction in trabecular meshwork stem cell content in donor eyes with primary open angle glaucoma.

Sundaresan Y, Manivannan L, Radhakrishnan S, Ramasamy K, Veerappan M, Chidambaranathan G Sci Rep. 2022; 11(1):24518.

PMID: 34972817 PMC: 8720087. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03345-1.


Generics versus brand-named drugs for glaucoma: the debate continues.

Bhartiya S, Dhingra D Rom J Ophthalmol. 2020; 64(3):239-244.

PMID: 33367157 PMC: 7739547.


The Use of Generic Medications for Glaucoma.

Tatham A J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020:1651265.

PMID: 32322409 PMC: 7166283. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1651265.