» Articles » PMID: 17312291

An Empirical Examination of the Stage Theory of Grief

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Feb 22
PMID 17312291
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: The stage theory of grief remains a widely accepted model of bereavement adjustment still taught in medical schools, espoused by physicians, and applied in diverse contexts. Nevertheless, the stage theory of grief has previously not been tested empirically.

Objective: To examine the relative magnitudes and patterns of change over time postloss of 5 grief indicators for consistency with the stage theory of grief.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Longitudinal cohort study (Yale Bereavement Study) of 233 bereaved individuals living in Connecticut, with data collected between January 2000 and January 2003.

Main Outcome Measures: Five rater-administered items assessing disbelief, yearning, anger, depression, and acceptance of the death from 1 to 24 months postloss.

Results: Counter to stage theory, disbelief was not the initial, dominant grief indicator. Acceptance was the most frequently endorsed item and yearning was the dominant negative grief indicator from 1 to 24 months postloss. In models that take into account the rise and fall of psychological responses, once rescaled, disbelief decreased from an initial high at 1 month postloss, yearning peaked at 4 months postloss, anger peaked at 5 months postloss, and depression peaked at 6 months postloss. Acceptance increased throughout the study observation period. The 5 grief indicators achieved their respective maximum values in the sequence (disbelief, yearning, anger, depression, and acceptance) predicted by the stage theory of grief.

Conclusions: Identification of the normal stages of grief following a death from natural causes enhances understanding of how the average person cognitively and emotionally processes the loss of a family member. Given that the negative grief indicators all peak within approximately 6 months postloss, those who score high on these indicators beyond 6 months postloss might benefit from further evaluation.

Citing Articles

Protocol of a nation-wide post-bereavement survey on quality of hospice and palliative care: J-HOPE 5 study.

Aoyama M, Mori M, Morita T, Tsuneto S, Miyashita M BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):277.

PMID: 39627748 PMC: 11613901. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01600-6.


Pair bond quality influences social conditioned place preference expression, passive coping behavior, and central oxytocin receptor expression following partner loss in male prairie voles.

Vitale E, Tbaba A, Sanchez S, Hale L, Kenkel W, Johnson M Soc Neurosci. 2024; 19(4):273-286.

PMID: 39577457 PMC: 11654629. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2024.2428598.


Prairie voles as a model for adaptive reward remodeling following loss of a bonded partner.

Sadino J, Donaldson Z Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024; 1535(1):20-30.

PMID: 38594916 PMC: 11334365. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.15134.


Correlates of post-traumatic growth among persons bereaved from cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

K N, Rajkumar E, Gopi A, Hareesh P, Romate J, Lakshmi R PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0300291.

PMID: 38489290 PMC: 10942051. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300291.


Life beyond Loss: A Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of Meaning of Life Therapy on the Grieving Process of Cancer Patients' Family Caregivers.

Freitas M, Remondes-Costa S, Veiga E, Macedo G, Teixeira R, Leite M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38391846 PMC: 10887668. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040471.