» Articles » PMID: 17310935

Relation Between Chemokine Receptor Use, Disease Stage, and HIV-1 Subtypes A and D: Results from a Rural Ugandan Cohort

Overview
Date 2007 Feb 22
PMID 17310935
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether there are differences in coreceptor use in subjects infected with HIV-1 envelope subtypes A and D that could explain the differences in progression rates between these subtypes in a rural Ugandan cohort.

Methods: HIV-1 was subtyped in env by V3 sequencing or heteroduplex mobility assay. Coreceptor use was determined by the ability of the isolates to replicate in U87 CD4 cells expressing different coreceptors. The Fisher exact test was used to examine the relation between coreceptor use and subtype, clinical stage, and V3 charge. The Kruskall-Wallis nonparametric test was used to examine the association between median CD4 cell counts, coreceptor use, and subtype. Logistic regression was used to examine predicted coreceptor use at different CD4 groupings.

Results: Isolates from 66 participants were analyzed. Thirty-one were infected with subtype A, and 35 were infected with subtype D. Although this work was based on a small sample size, we found statistically significant differences. The probability of having an X4 virus was higher in subtype D infections than in subtype A infections among those with a non-AIDS clinical status (Fisher exact test, P = 0.040). Logistic regression analysis, in which we predicted X4 use by subtype and stratified by CD4 group, confirmed these findings among those with a CD4 count >200 cells/microL (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.003). R5 viruses were associated with higher median CD4 cell counts than X4 or X4/R5 (Kruskall-Wallis test, P = 0.0045). A V3 charge of +5 and greater was highly associated with X4 virus (Fisher exact test, P = 0.006).

Conclusions: These subtype differences in coreceptor use may partially explain the faster progression rates we have previously reported in individuals infected with subtype D compared with subtype A. Our observations may have implications for the future use of coreceptor inhibitors in this population.

Citing Articles

Prediction of the Co-receptor usage of the main worldwide HIV-1 subtypes, CRF, and CRF35-AD in Iranian patients via the five genotypic tools.

Hashempour A, Akbarinia S, Khodadad N, Safari F, Mehrabi Z Biochem Biophys Rep. 2025; 41:101939.

PMID: 40034260 PMC: 11875805. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.101939.


Addressing an HIV cure in LMIC.

Ismail S, Pankrac J, Ndashimye E, Prodger J, Abrahams M, Mann J Retrovirology. 2021; 18(1):21.

PMID: 34344423 PMC: 8330180. DOI: 10.1186/s12977-021-00565-1.


Phenotypic and Genotypic Co-receptor Tropism Testing in HIV-1 Epidemic Region of Tanzania Where Multiple Non-B Subtypes Co-circulate.

Judicate G, Barabona G, Kamori D, Mahiti M, Tan T, Ozono S Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:703041.

PMID: 34305873 PMC: 8292895. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.703041.


HIV-1 Envelope Glycosylation and the Signal Peptide.

Lambert G, Upadhyay C Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(2).

PMID: 33669676 PMC: 7922494. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020176.


HIV-1 Sequences from Ugandan Early Infections Reveal Sequence Variants Associated with Elevated Replication Capacity.

Kapaata A, Balinda S, Xu R, Salazar M, Herard K, Brooks K Viruses. 2021; 13(2).

PMID: 33498793 PMC: 7912664. DOI: 10.3390/v13020171.