Value of Image Fusion in the Staging of Prostatic Carcinoma
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: We assessed the value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic cancer in a series of 32 patients who underwent preoperative evaluation with transrectal colour-Doppler ultrasonography (TRUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Materials And Methods: Colour-Doppler TRUS exams were performed using a 7.5-MHz biplanar probe. MRI exams were done with a scanner operating at 1.5 Tesla (T) using an endorectal coil. All patients underwent radical prostatectomy within 2 weeks from the imaging assessment. Whole-mount sections were prepared from the surgical specimens and were subsequently digitised by using a high-resolution scanner. The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) TRUS and MR images as well as the digitised pathological images were transferred to a graphic workstation to perform image fusion.
Results: Image fusion was technically possible in 25/32 cases in which axial TRUS images were available. The following fusion images were obtained: TRUS + pathological sections; MRI + pathological sections; TRUS + MRI + pathological sections. The final pathological staging concerning the T status was: four pT2b, fourteen pT2c, three pT3a and four pT3b. The three types of image fusion led to the following results: TRUS + pathological sections, correct staging in 20/25 cases (accuracy 80%); MRI + pathological sections, correct staging in 22/25 cases (accuracy 88%); TRUS + MRI + pathological sections, correct staging in 23/25 cases (accuracy 92%).
Conclusions: Our study suggests that by using image fusion between colour-Doppler TRUS and endorectal MRI, it is possible to improve the accuracy of pathological staging in patients who are candidates for radical prostatectomy.
Priester A, Natarajan S, Le J, Garritano J, Radosavcev B, Grundfest W Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2014; 2(2):127-35.
PMID: 25374914 PMC: 4219304.
Gomez-Iturriaga A, Crook J, Casquero F, Carvajal C, Urresola A, Canteli B J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2014; 6(2):154-60.
PMID: 25097555 PMC: 4105645. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2014.43299.
Dimensional stability in composite cone beam computed tomography.
Kopp S, Ottl P Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39(8):512-6.
PMID: 21062945 PMC: 3520214. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28358586.
Puech P, Betrouni N, Makni N, Dewalle A, Villers A, Lemaitre L Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009; 4(1):1-10.
PMID: 20033597 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-008-0261-2.
MR-guided prostate interventions.
Tempany C, Straus S, Hata N, Haker S J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 27(2):356-67.
PMID: 18219689 PMC: 2683388. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21259.