Background:
Guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) for colorectal cancer screening are not specific for human hemoglobin and have low sensitivity. Automated-development, immunochemical FOBT is quality-controlled, is specific for human hemoglobin, and does not require diet restriction.
Objectives:
To measure the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative immunochemical fecal hemoglobin measurements for detection of cancer and advanced adenoma in patients undergoing colonoscopy, to determine fecal hemoglobin thresholds that give the highest posttest probability for neoplasia, and to determine the number of immunochemical FOBTs needed.
Design:
Prospective, cross-sectional study.
Setting:
Ambulatory endoscopy services of the main health medical organization in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Participants:
1000 consecutive ambulatory patients--some asymptomatic but at increased risk for colorectal neoplasia and some symptomatic--who were undergoing elective colonoscopy and volunteered to prepare immunochemical FOBTs.
Intervention:
The hemoglobin content of 3 bowel movements was measured, and the highest value was compared with colonoscopy findings.
Measurements:
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and 95% CIs of fecal hemoglobin measurements for clinically significant neoplasia, their relationship to the amount of fecal hemoglobin measured, and the number of immunochemical FOBTs performed.
Results:
Colonoscopy identified clinically significant neoplasia in 91 patients (cancer in 17 patients and advanced adenomas in 74 patients). Using 3 immunochemical FOBTs and a hemoglobin threshold of 75 ng/mL of buffer, sensitivity and specificity were 94.1% (95% CI, 82.9% to 100.0%) and 87.5% (CI, 85.4% to 89.6%), respectively, for cancer and 67% (CI, 57.4% to 76.7%) and 91.4% (CI, 89.6% to 93.2%), respectively, for any clinically significant neoplasia.
Limitations:
The fecal sampling method is standardized, but the sample size depends on fecal consistency. Some patients were tested while discontinuing aspirin and anticoagulant therapies. Study patients were at increased risk, and results might not apply to average-risk populations.
Conclusions:
Quantitative immunochemical FOBT has good sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant neoplasia. Test performance in screening average-risk populations is not known.
Citing Articles
Does FIT have a role in the detection of small bowel pathology: a prospective study.
Oka P, Johnson C, McAlindon M, Sidhu R
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 17:26317745241301553.
PMID: 39610703
PMC: 11603454.
DOI: 10.1177/26317745241301553.
Interval Advanced Adenomas and Neoplasia in Patients with Negative Colonoscopy Following Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.
Liu K, George R, Shin C, Xiong J, Jamali T, Liu Y
Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 70(1):350-359.
PMID: 39581897
PMC: 11854550.
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08748-4.
FIT as a Comparator for Evaluating the Effectiveness of New Non-invasive CRC Screening Test.
Senore C, Doubeni C, Guittet L
Dig Dis Sci. 2024; .
PMID: 39560807
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08718-w.
Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds: An International Survey of Population-Based Screening Programs.
Young G, Benton S, Bresalier R, Chiu H, Dekker E, Fraser C
Dig Dis Sci. 2024; .
PMID: 39528850
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08664-7.
Possibility of determining high quantitative fecal occult blood on stool surface using hyperspectral imaging.
Ikematsu H, Takara Y, Nishihara K, Kano Y, Owaki Y, Okamoto R
J Gastroenterol. 2024; 60(1):77-85.
PMID: 39441401
PMC: 11717890.
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-024-02163-2.
Development and validation of machine learning models for young-onset colorectal cancer risk stratification.
Zhen J, Li J, Liao F, Zhang J, Liu C, Xie H
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):239.
PMID: 39438621
PMC: 11496529.
DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00719-2.
From-Toilet-to-Freezer: A Review on Requirements for an Automatic Protocol to Collect and Store Human Fecal Samples for Research Purposes.
Widjaja F, Rietjens I
Biomedicines. 2023; 11(10).
PMID: 37893032
PMC: 10603957.
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11102658.
Appropriateness of fecal immunochemical testing utilization for colorectal cancer screening at an academic center.
Masood U, Bernshteyn M, Pavelock N, Singh K, Schad L, Morley C
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022; 36(1):20-23.
PMID: 36578591
PMC: 9762794.
DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2123667.
Impact of time between faecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening on screening results: A natural experiment.
Ribe S, Botteri E, Loberg M, Randel K, Kalager M, Nilsen J
Int J Cancer. 2022; 152(7):1414-1424.
PMID: 36346118
PMC: 10098820.
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34351.
Effectiveness of Multiple Consecutive Fecal Immunohistochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Santiago L, Toro D
P R Health Sci J. 2022; 41(3):117-122.
PMID: 36018738
PMC: 10116953.
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.
Grobbee E, Wisse P, Schreuders E, van Roon A, van Dam L, Zauber A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 6:CD009276.
PMID: 35665911
PMC: 9169237.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
The Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis.
Phuangrach N, Sarakarn P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022; 23(3):759-766.
PMID: 35345344
PMC: 9360958.
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.759.
Faecal haemoglobin concentration in adenoma, before and after polypectomy, approaches the ideal tumour marker.
Mowat C, Digby J, Cleary S, Gray L, Datt P, Goudie D
Ann Clin Biochem. 2022; 59(4):272-276.
PMID: 35235491
PMC: 9280698.
DOI: 10.1177/00045632221080897.
Analysis of volatile organic compounds released from SW480 colorectal cancer cells and the blood of tumor-bearing mice.
Liu D, Ji L, Li M, Li D, Guo L, Nie M
Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 8(8):2736-2751.
PMID: 35117031
PMC: 8797338.
DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2019.10.21.
Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
Zhou R, Wang P, Li Y, Zhang Y, Ma M, Meng F
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:762560.
PMID: 34765625
PMC: 8575757.
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.762560.
Comparative effectiveness of five fecal immunochemical tests using colonoscopy as the gold standard: study protocol.
Levy B, Daly J, Xu Y, Crockett S, Hoffman R, Dawson J
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021; 106:106430.
PMID: 33974994
PMC: 8227954.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106430.
Detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia and relative colonoscopy workloads using quantitative faecal immunochemical tests: an observational study exploring the effects of simultaneous adjustment of both sample number and test positivity threshold.
Young G, Woodman R, Symonds E
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020; 7(1).
PMID: 32994195
PMC: 7526287.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000517.
Biomarkers Predictive of Response to Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Cornish J, Wirthgen E, Dabritz J
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020; 7:8.
PMID: 32064265
PMC: 7000528.
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00008.
Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Selby K, Levine E, Doan C, Gies A, Brenner H, Quesenberry C
Gastroenterology. 2019; 157(6):1494-1505.
PMID: 31472152
PMC: 6878177.
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.023.
Quantile-based fecal hemoglobin concentration for assessing colorectal neoplasms with 1,263,717 Taiwanese screenees.
Peng S, Chiu H, Jen H, Hsu C, Chen S, Chiu S
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019; 19(1):94.
PMID: 31046760
PMC: 6498550.
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0812-1.