» Articles » PMID: 17302945

Objective and Subjective Hardness of a Test Item Used for Evaluating Food Mixing Ability

Overview
Journal J Oral Rehabil
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2007 Feb 17
PMID 17302945
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare objective and subjective hardness of selected common foods with a wax cube used as a test item in a mixing ability test. Objective hardness was determined for 11 foods (cream cheese, boiled fish paste, boiled beef, apple, raw carrot, peanut, soft/hard rice cracker, jelly, plain chocolate and chewing gum) and the wax cube. Peak force (N) to compress each item was obtained from force-time curves generated with the Tensipresser. Perceived hardness ratings of each item were made by 30 dentate subjects (mean age 26.9 years) using a visual analogue scale (100 mm). These subjective assessments were given twice with a 1 week interval. High intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest reliability were seen for all foods (ICC > 0.68; P < 0.001). One-way anova found a significant effect of food type on both the objective hardness score and the subjective hardness rating (P < 0.001). The wax cube showed significant lower objective hardness score (32.6 N) and subjective hardness rating (47.7) than peanut (45.3 N, 63.5) and raw carrot (82.5 N, 78.4) [P < 0.05; Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch (REGW)-F]. A significant semilogarithmic relationship was found between the logarithm of objective hardness scores and subjective hardness ratings across twelve test items (r = 0.90; P < 0.001). These results suggest the wax cube has a softer texture compared with test foods traditionally used for masticatory performance test, such as peanut and raw carrot. The hardness of the wax cube could be modified to simulate a range of test foods by changing mixture ratio of soft and hard paraffin wax.

Citing Articles

Comparison of perceived masticatory ability in completely edentulous patients treated with thermoplastic complete denture versus single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a single-center prospective observational study.

Fayad M, Mahmoud I, Aly Shon A, Elboraey M, Bakr R, Moussa R PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17670.

PMID: 38978757 PMC: 11229681. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17670.


The use of digital texture image analysis in determining the masticatory efficiency outcome.

Lemic A, Rajkovic K, Radovic K, Zivkovic R, Milicic B, Peric M PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0250936.

PMID: 33956854 PMC: 8101913. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250936.


Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals.

Soni R, Yadav H, Pathak A, Bhatnagar A, Kumar V J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020; 20(3):312-320.

PMID: 33223702 PMC: 7654204. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19.


Effects of self-assessed chewing ability, tooth loss and serum albumin on mortality in 80-year-old individuals: a 20-year follow-up study.

Nomura Y, Kakuta E, Okada A, Otsuka R, Shimada M, Tomizawa Y BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1):122.

PMID: 32316955 PMC: 7175538. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01113-7.


Novel intraoperative use of the "Tensipresser" to assess factors predictive of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Mikamori M, Gotoh K, Takahashi H, Akita H, Tomokuni A, Kobayashi S Surg Today. 2017; 47(10):1201-1207.

PMID: 28324164 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-017-1509-7.