Objective and Subjective Hardness of a Test Item Used for Evaluating Food Mixing Ability
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The aim of this study was to compare objective and subjective hardness of selected common foods with a wax cube used as a test item in a mixing ability test. Objective hardness was determined for 11 foods (cream cheese, boiled fish paste, boiled beef, apple, raw carrot, peanut, soft/hard rice cracker, jelly, plain chocolate and chewing gum) and the wax cube. Peak force (N) to compress each item was obtained from force-time curves generated with the Tensipresser. Perceived hardness ratings of each item were made by 30 dentate subjects (mean age 26.9 years) using a visual analogue scale (100 mm). These subjective assessments were given twice with a 1 week interval. High intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest reliability were seen for all foods (ICC > 0.68; P < 0.001). One-way anova found a significant effect of food type on both the objective hardness score and the subjective hardness rating (P < 0.001). The wax cube showed significant lower objective hardness score (32.6 N) and subjective hardness rating (47.7) than peanut (45.3 N, 63.5) and raw carrot (82.5 N, 78.4) [P < 0.05; Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch (REGW)-F]. A significant semilogarithmic relationship was found between the logarithm of objective hardness scores and subjective hardness ratings across twelve test items (r = 0.90; P < 0.001). These results suggest the wax cube has a softer texture compared with test foods traditionally used for masticatory performance test, such as peanut and raw carrot. The hardness of the wax cube could be modified to simulate a range of test foods by changing mixture ratio of soft and hard paraffin wax.
Fayad M, Mahmoud I, Aly Shon A, Elboraey M, Bakr R, Moussa R PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17670.
PMID: 38978757 PMC: 11229681. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17670.
The use of digital texture image analysis in determining the masticatory efficiency outcome.
Lemic A, Rajkovic K, Radovic K, Zivkovic R, Milicic B, Peric M PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0250936.
PMID: 33956854 PMC: 8101913. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250936.
Soni R, Yadav H, Pathak A, Bhatnagar A, Kumar V J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020; 20(3):312-320.
PMID: 33223702 PMC: 7654204. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19.
Nomura Y, Kakuta E, Okada A, Otsuka R, Shimada M, Tomizawa Y BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1):122.
PMID: 32316955 PMC: 7175538. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01113-7.
Mikamori M, Gotoh K, Takahashi H, Akita H, Tomokuni A, Kobayashi S Surg Today. 2017; 47(10):1201-1207.
PMID: 28324164 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-017-1509-7.