» Articles » PMID: 17301236

Tissue-driven Hypothesis of Genomic Evolution and Sequence-expression Correlations

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Feb 16
PMID 17301236
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To maintain normal physiological functions, different tissues may have different developmental constraints on expressed genes. Consequently, the evolutionary tolerance for genomic evolution varies among tissues. Here, we formulate this argument as a "tissue-driven hypothesis" based on the stabilizing selection model. Moreover, several predicted genomic correlations are tested by the human-mouse microarray data. Our results are as follows. First, between the human and mouse, we have elaborated the among-tissue covariation between tissue expression distance (E(ti)) and tissue sequence distance (D(ti)). This highly significant E(ti) - D(ti) correlation emerges when the expression divergence and protein sequence divergence are under the same tissue constraints. Second, the tissue-driven hypothesis further explains the observed significant correlation between the tissue expression distance (between the human and mouse) and the duplicate tissue distance (T(dup)) between human (or mouse) paralogous genes. In other words, between-duplicate and interspecies expression divergences covary among tissues. Third, for genes with the same expression broadness, we found that genes expressed in more stringent tissues (e.g., neurorelated) generally tend to evolve more slowly than those in more relaxed tissues (e.g., hormone-related). We conclude that tissue factors should be considered as an important component in shaping the pattern of genomic evolution and correlations.

Citing Articles

Divergence in MiRNA targeting of AchAco and its role in citrate accumulation in kiwifruit.

Ling L, Hu X, Zhang S BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):1157.

PMID: 39617927 PMC: 11610084. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05877-w.


Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Majane A, Cridland J, Blair L, Begun D Genetics. 2024; 227(2).

PMID: 38518250 PMC: 11151936. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae039.


Genetic analysis of ocular tumour-associated genes using large genomic datasets: insights into selection constraints and variant representation in the population.

Tanner A, Sagoo M, Mahroo O, Pulido J BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024; 9(1).

PMID: 38388005 PMC: 10897839. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001565.


Cross-Species Comparative DNA Methylation Reveals Novel Insights into Complex Trait Genetics among Cattle, Sheep, and Goats.

Chen S, Liu S, Shi S, Yin H, Tang Y, Zhang J Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(2).

PMID: 38266195 PMC: 10834038. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae003.


A compendium of genetic regulatory effects across pig tissues.

Teng J, Gao Y, Yin H, Bai Z, Liu S, Zeng H Nat Genet. 2024; 56(1):112-123.

PMID: 38177344 PMC: 10786720. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01585-7.


References
1.
Caceres M, Lachuer J, Zapala M, Redmond J, Kudo L, Geschwind D . Elevated gene expression levels distinguish human from non-human primate brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(22):13030-5. PMC: 240739. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2135499100. View

2.
Liao B, Zhang J . Evolutionary conservation of expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2005; 23(3):530-40. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj054. View

3.
Eisen J, Fraser C . Phylogenomics: intersection of evolution and genomics. Science. 2003; 300(5626):1706-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1086292. View

4.
Lande R . EFFECTIVE DEME SIZES DURING LONG-TERM EVOLUTION ESTIMATED FROM RATES OF CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENT. Evolution. 2017; 33(1Part1):234-251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04678.x. View

5.
King M, Wilson A . Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science. 1975; 188(4184):107-16. DOI: 10.1126/science.1090005. View