» Articles » PMID: 17294497

Psychiatric Disorders and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from the National Latino and Asian American Study

Overview
Journal Health Econ
Publisher Wiley
Date 2007 Feb 13
PMID 17294497
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper investigates to what extent psychiatric disorders and mental distress affect labor market outcomes in two rapidly growing populations that have not been studied to date-ethnic minorities of Latino and Asian descent, most of whom are immigrants. Using data from the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS), we examine the labor market effects of meeting diagnostic criteria for any psychiatric disorder in the past 12 months as well as the effects of psychiatric distress in the past year. The labor market outcomes analyzed are current employment status, the number of weeks worked in the past year among those who are employed, and having at least one work absence in the past month among those who are employed. Among Latinos, psychiatric disorders and mental distress are associated with detrimental effects on employment and absenteeism, similar to effects found in previous analyses of mostly white, American born populations. Among Asians, we find more mixed evidence that psychiatric disorders and mental distress detract from labor market outcomes. Our findings suggest that reducing disparities and expanding access to effective treatment may have significant labor market benefits-not just for majority populations, as has been demonstrated, but also for Asians and Latinos.

Citing Articles

Racial and ethnic differences in comorbid psychosis: a population-based study.

Sankoh M, Clifford J, Peterson R, Prom-Wormley E Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1280253.

PMID: 39140109 PMC: 11320602. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1280253.


Citizenship as Privilege and Social Identity: Implications for Psychological Distress.

Gee G, Morey B, Walsemann K, Ro A, Takeuchi D Am Behav Sci. 2023; 60(5-6):680-704.

PMID: 37850037 PMC: 10580256. DOI: 10.1177/0002764216632834.


Psychometric properties of the Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health: a validation study.

Lacerda M, Vieira M, Marques F, Alves J, Pereira M, Carmo A Sao Paulo Med J. 2023; 142(2):e2022444.

PMID: 37556681 PMC: 10403193. DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623.


Mental health and labor supply: Evidence from Canada.

Shen Y SSM Popul Health. 2023; 22:101414.

PMID: 37168248 PMC: 10165450. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101414.


Excess healthcare costs of psychological distress in young women: Evidence from linked national Medicare claims data.

Jayawardana D, Gannon B, Doust J, Mishra G Health Econ. 2022; 32(3):715-734.

PMID: 36495290 PMC: 10947058. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4641.


References
1.
Wittchen H . Reliability and validity studies of the WHO--Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res. 1994; 28(1):57-84. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(94)90036-1. View

2.
Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine J . Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA. 2004; 291(21):2581-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.21.2581. View

3.
Heeringa S, Wagner J, Torres M, Duan N, Adams T, Berglund P . Sample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005; 13(4):221-40. PMC: 6878487. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.179. View

4.
McKenzie K, Whitley R, Weich S . Social capital and mental health. Br J Psychiatry. 2002; 181:280-3. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.181.4.280. View

5.
Kessler R, Frank R . The impact of psychiatric disorders on work loss days. Psychol Med. 1997; 27(4):861-73. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291797004807. View