» Articles » PMID: 17287923

Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: Are Transfascial Sutures Necessary? A Review of the Literature

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Feb 9
PMID 17287923
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias is rapidly becoming more commonplace in the armamentarium of general surgeons. Its utility and low recurrence rates make it a very attractive option. As with all newer procedures, controversies exist with this approach. One significant aspect is the method of fixation for the biomaterial. Most authors add the use of transfascial sutures. Others, in the minority, do not.

Methods: A literature search using Medline and PubMed was used to evaluate the best practice for fixation in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair.

Results: This review of the current literature (including comparative series) seems to show that the recurrence rate is approximately 4% with the use of sutures and 1.8% without their use. However, these data do not show that there is tremendous variation in the method and manner of placing transfascial sutures or that long-term follow-up evaluation is inadequate in most series. No firm conclusions can be drawn about whether it is detrimental to omit the use of transfascial sutures.

Conclusions: On the basis of this review, a larger overlap of the prosthesis (5 vs 3 cm) is necessary if sutures are not used. If sutures are used, they should be placed no more than 5 cm apart. Prospective randomized trials with and without of transfascial sutures using a consistent biomaterial are necessary to settle this issue.

Citing Articles

Enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair in a patient with incisional hernia after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a case report.

Honma S, Tanino K, Kumode T, Mizuno R, Matsui Y, Yao S Surg Case Rep. 2022; 8(1):28.

PMID: 35129733 PMC: 8821765. DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01380-2.


Laparoscopic management of recurrent ventral hernia: an experience of 222 patients.

Dey S, Parthasarathi R, Sabnis S, Jain R, Raj P, Senthilnathan P Hernia. 2019; 23(5):927-934.

PMID: 30778855 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01912-0.


Development of an open prospective observational multicentre cohort study to determine the impact of standardization of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for incisional hernia on clinical outcome and quality of life (LIPOM-Trial).

Hellinger A, Wotzlaw F, Fackeldey V, Pistorius G, Zdichavsky M, Junemann R Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018; 4:118-123.

PMID: 29736474 PMC: 5935894. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.08.001.


A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair.

Belyansky I, Daes J, Radu V, Balasubramanian R, Zahiri H, Weltz A Surg Endosc. 2017; 32(3):1525-1532.

PMID: 28916960 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5840-2.


Long-term retromuscular and intraperitoneal mesh size changes within a randomized controlled trial on incisional hernia repair, including a review of the literature.

Rogmark P, Ekberg O, Montgomery A Hernia. 2017; 21(5):687-696.

PMID: 28634690 PMC: 5608776. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1624-9.


References
1.
Parker 3rd H, Nottingham J, Bynoe R, Yost M . Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. Am Surg. 2002; 68(6):530-3; discussion 533-4. View

2.
Gonzalez R, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Ramshaw B . Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair. JSLS. 2003; 7(4):323-8. PMC: 3021337. View

3.
Gillian G, Geis W, Grover G . Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (LIVH): an evolving outpatient technique. JSLS. 2002; 6(4):315-22. PMC: 3043451. View

4.
Kyzer S, Alis M, Aloni Y, Charuzi I . Laparoscopic repair of postoperation ventral hernia. Early postoperation results. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13(9):928-31. DOI: 10.1007/s004649901137. View

5.
LeBlanc K, Whitaker J, Bellanger D, Rhynes V . Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernioplasty: lessons learned from 200 patients. Hernia. 2003; 7(3):118-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-003-0117-1. View