» Articles » PMID: 17285126

Predictive Genetic Testing for BRCA1/2 in a UK Clinical Cohort: Three-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Feb 8
PMID 17285126
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective multicentre study assesses long-term impact of genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer predisposition in a clinical cohort. Areas evaluated include risk management, distress and insurance problems 3 years post-testing. Participants are adults unaffected with cancer from families with a known BRCA1/2 mutation. One hundred and ninety-three out of 285 (70% response) participants at nine UK clinical genetics centres completed assessments at 3 years: 80% female; 37% carriers of a BRCA1/2 mutation. In the 3 years, post-genetic testing carriers reported more risk management activities than non-carriers. Fifty-five per cent of female carriers opted for risk reducing surgery; 43% oophorectomy; and 34% mastectomy. Eighty-nine per cent had mammograms compared with 47% non-carriers. Thirty-six per cent non-carriers > or =50 years did not have a mammogram post-test. Twenty-two per cent male carriers had colorectal and 44% prostate screening compared with 5 and 19% non-carriers respectively. Seven per cent carriers and 1% non-carriers developed cancer. Distress levels did not differ in carriers and non-carriers at 3-year follow-up. Forty per cent of female carriers reported difficulties with life and/or health insurance. Given the return to pre-test levels of concern among female non-carriers at 3 years and a substantial minority not engaging in recommended screening, there appears to be a need to help some women understand the meaning of their genetic status.

Citing Articles

Assessing Psychological Morbidity in Cancer-Unaffected Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Systematic Review.

Isselhard A, Lautz Z, Rhiem K, Stock S Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(4):3590-3608.

PMID: 37185387 PMC: 10136916. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30040274.


Testing a deliberative democracy method with citizens of African ancestry to weigh pros and cons of targeted screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Guan Y, Pathak S, Ballard D, Veluswamy J, McCullough L, McBride C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:984926.

PMID: 36424974 PMC: 9679525. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.984926.


Psychological Impact of -Variant-Carrier Newborns and Counselling on Mothers: A Pediatric Surveillance Cohort.

Gozdziejewski A, Zotti C, de Carvalho I, Dos Santos T, de Santi Walter L, Ogradowski K Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(12).

PMID: 35740610 PMC: 9221115. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122945.


Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.

Tiller J, McInerney-Leo A, Belcher A, Boughtwood T, Gleeson P, Delatycki M BMC Med Ethics. 2021; 22(1):63.

PMID: 34020638 PMC: 8138092. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00634-2.


Survey of primary care physicians' views about breast and ovarian cancer screening for true BRCA1/2 non-carriers.

Pelletier S, Larouche G, Chiquette J, El Haffaf Z, Foulkes W, Hamet P J Community Genet. 2019; 11(2):205-213.

PMID: 31659621 PMC: 7062973. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00438-3.


References
1.
Hopwood P, Keeling F, Long A, Pool C, Evans G, Howell A . Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators. Psychooncology. 1998; 7(5):402-12. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(1998090)7:5<402::AID-PON317>3.0.CO;2-X. View

2.
Lodder L, Frets P, Trijsburg R, Meijers-Heijboer E, Klijn J, Duivenvoorden H . Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet. 2001; 98(1):15-24. View

3.
Schwartz M, Kaufman E, Peshkin B, Isaacs C, Hughes C, DeMarco T . Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(21):4034-41. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.088. View

4.
Watson M, Foster C, Eeles R, Eccles D, Ashley S, Davidson R . Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort. Br J Cancer. 2004; 91(10):1787-94. PMC: 2410052. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207. View

5.
Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, Balshem A, Lustbader E, Heggan T . Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85(13):1074-80. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.13.1074. View