» Articles » PMID: 17284412

Female Butterflies Prefer Males Bearing Bright Iridescent Ornamentation

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Feb 8
PMID 17284412
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Butterflies are among nature's most colorful animals, and provide a living showcase for how extremely bright, chromatic and iridescent coloration can be generated by complex optical mechanisms. The gross characteristics of male butterfly colour patterns are understood to function for species and/or sex recognition, but it is not known whether female mate choice promotes visual exaggeration of this coloration. Here I show that females of the sexually dichromatic species Hypolimnas bolina prefer conspecific males that possess bright iridescent blue/ultraviolet dorsal ornamentation. In separate field and enclosure experiments, using both dramatic and graded wing colour manipulations, I demonstrate that a moderate qualitative reduction in signal brightness and chromaticity has the same consequences as removing the signal entirely. These findings validate a long-held hypothesis, and argue for the importance of intra- versus interspecific selection as the driving force behind the exaggeration of bright, iridescent butterfly colour patterns.

Citing Articles

Natural and sexual selection and functional roles influence colouration but not the amount of variation in butterfly wing colour patterns.

Dharmaraaj B, Kunte K BMC Ecol Evol. 2025; 25(1):11.

PMID: 39825244 PMC: 11740640. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02346-8.


Dorsoventral comparison of intraspecific variation in the butterfly wing pattern using a convolutional neural network.

Amino K, Hirakawa T, Yago M, Matsuo T Biol Lett. 2025; 21(1):20240446.

PMID: 39809329 PMC: 11732418. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0446.


VOC Characterization of (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) and Its Visual and Olfactory Responses during Foraging and Courtship.

Li M, Liu J, Chen S, Yao J, Shi L, Chen H Insects. 2024; 15(7).

PMID: 39057280 PMC: 11276791. DOI: 10.3390/insects15070548.


Subtle Introgression Footprints at the End of the Speciation Continuum in a Clade of Heliconius Butterflies.

Rougemont Q, Huber B, Martin S, Whibley A, Estrada C, Solano D Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(7).

PMID: 37467472 PMC: 10375063. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad166.


Investigating the Effect of Reflectance Tuning on Photocatalytic Dye Degradation with Biotemplated ZnO Photonic Nanoarchitectures Based on Butterfly Wings.

Piszter G, Nagy G, Kertesz K, Baji Z, Kovacs K, Balint Z Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(9).

PMID: 37176465 PMC: 10179795. DOI: 10.3390/ma16093584.


References
1.
Hunt , Cuthill , Bennett , Griffiths . Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit. Anim Behav. 1999; 58(4):809-815. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1214. View

2.
Knuttel H, Fiedler K . Host-plant-derived variation in ultraviolet wing patterns influences mate selection by male butterflies. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 14):2447-59. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.14.2447. View

3.
Bonduriansky R . The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001; 76(3):305-39. DOI: 10.1017/s1464793101005693. View

4.
Beldade P, Koops K, Brakefield P . Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature. 2002; 416(6883):844-7. DOI: 10.1038/416844a. View

5.
Kemp D . Sexual selection constrained by life history in a butterfly. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1498):1341-5. PMC: 1691043. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2000. View