Developing Symbolic Capacity One Step at a Time
Overview
Affiliations
The present research examines the ability of children as young as 4 years to use models in tasks that require scaling of distance along a single dimension. In Experiment 1, we found that tasks involving models are similar in difficulty to those involving maps that we studied earlier (Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N., & Vasilyeva, M. (1999). Spatial scaling in young children. Psychological Science, 10, 393-398). In Experiment 2, we found that retrieval tasks, where children indicate the location of a hidden object in an actual space are substantially more difficult than placement tasks, where children put a visible object in a particular location in an actual space. We discuss possible implications of the differential difficulty of retrieval and placement tasks for the understanding of symbolic development.
Visually Scaling Distance from Memory: Do Visible Midline Boundaries Make a Difference?.
Hund A, Plumert J, Recker K Spat Cogn Comput. 2022; 20(2):134-159.
PMID: 35082551 PMC: 8789002. DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2020.1734601.
The Acquisition of Survey Knowledge by Individuals With Down Syndrome.
Himmelberger Z, Merrill E, Conners F, Roskos B, Yang Y, Robinson T Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:256.
PMID: 32719594 PMC: 7350862. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00256.
Number Representations Drive Number-Line Estimates.
Yuan L, Prather R, Mix K, Smith L Child Dev. 2019; 91(4):e952-e967.
PMID: 31657470 PMC: 8918053. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13333.
Landmark and route knowledge in children's spatial representation of a virtual environment.
Nys M, Gyselinck V, Orriols E, Hickmann M Front Psychol. 2015; 5:1522.
PMID: 25667573 PMC: 4304237. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01522.
Izard V, ODonnell E, Spelke E Child Dev. 2013; 85(1):237-49.
PMID: 23647223 PMC: 3751975. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12114.