» Articles » PMID: 17277995

Increasing Utilization of Cancer Genetic Counseling Services Using a Patient Navigator Model

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2007 Feb 6
PMID 17277995
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rarely has utilization of genetic counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) been studied separately from utilization of testing. At Kaiser Permanente Colorado, consistently only 30% of all members referred for HBOC attend genetic counseling. To increase the volume of genetic counseling appointments, a patient navigator approach was pilot tested in a randomized-controlled trial over 3 months. A total of 125 members were referred for HBOC genetic counseling (55 randomized to PN, 70 randomized to usual care). Utilization of referrals for Navigator-assisted members was 44%, compared to 31% in the usual care arm (p=0.16). The patient navigator significantly decreased time to appointment, with over 80% of Navigator-assisted members seen for genetic counseling less than three months from referral date, compared to 32% in usual care (p=0.002). patient navigator assistance shortens time from referral to appointment for HBOC genetic counseling, and may increase utilization of such services.

Citing Articles

Implementation of a Population-Based Cancer Family History Screening Program for Lynch Syndrome.

Lahiri S, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Moriarty K, Kubiliun N Cancer Control. 2023; 30:10732748231175011.

PMID: 37161761 PMC: 10185972. DOI: 10.1177/10732748231175011.


A practical method for integrating community priorities in planning and implementing cancer control programs.

Bilenduke E, Dwyer A, Staples E, Kilbourn K, Valverde P, Fernandez M Cancer Causes Control. 2023; 34(Suppl 1):113-123.

PMID: 37069456 PMC: 10110487. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01688-w.


Change agents in the oncology workforce: Let's be clear about community health workers and patient navigators.

Battaglia T, Zhang X, Dwyer A, Rush C, Paskett E Cancer. 2022; 128 Suppl 13:2664-2668.

PMID: 35699614 PMC: 9201990. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34194.


Reducing Disparities in Receipt of Genetic Counseling for Underserved Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Sutton A, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Quillin J, Rubinsak L, Temkin S, Gal T J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019; 29(8):1131-1135.

PMID: 31794334 PMC: 7462013. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7984.


Lung Cancer Screening and Epigenetics in African Americans: The Role of the Socioecological Framework.

Watson K, Hulbert A, Henderson V, Chukwudozie I, Aponte-Soto L, Lerner L Front Oncol. 2019; 9:87.

PMID: 30915271 PMC: 6423082. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00087.


References
1.
Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf J, Kerner J, Gomez-Caminero A, Hughes C . Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89(2):148-57. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/89.2.148. View

2.
Escher M, Sappino A . Primary care physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer predisposition. Ann Oncol. 2000; 11(9):1131-5. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008319114278. View

3.
Reyna V, LLOYD F, Whalen P . Genetic testing and medical decision making. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161(20):2406-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.20.2406. View

4.
Julian-Reynier C, Sobol H, Sevilla C, Nogues C, BOURRET P . Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. The French Cancer Genetic Network. Psychooncology. 2001; 9(6):504-10. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<504::aid-pon491>3.0.co;2-r. View

5.
Mouchawar J, Hensley-Alford S, Laurion S, Ellis J, Kulchak-Rahm A, Finucane M . Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organization: a naturally-occurring experiment. Genet Med. 2005; 7(3):191-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000156526.16967.7a. View