» Articles » PMID: 17274017

Neural Mechanisms of Evoked Oscillations: Stability and Interaction with Transient Events

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 Feb 3
PMID 17274017
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is increasing evidence that early event-related potentials are a result of phase alignment of ongoing background oscillations of the electroencephalogram rather than additive amplitude modulation. Steady state visual-evoked potentials (ssVEPs) can be recorded using an intensity modulated stimulus, resulting in an evoked brain response at a known frequency, i.e. the stimulation frequency. Given this property, the ssVEP is ideally suited for examining the relationship between single-trial fluctuations in phase/amplitude and the evoked brain potential resulting from averaging across trials. To address this issue, the current study investigated the contribution of single trial power and intertrial phase locking to ssVEP generation by presenting a peripheral flicker. Further, transient stimuli were presented during flicker and at three increasing latency lags following flicker offset to examine (1) to what extent a stimulus can disturb the ssVEP oscillation and (2) how phase alignment during P1-N1-P2 time windows is affected during presence of evoked oscillations. The former assessment evaluates the stability of ssVEPs and the latter the phase alignment processes to transient stimuli under experimentally induced background oscillations. We observed that ssVEPs are a result of phase alignment rather than single trial amplitude modulation. In addition, ssVEP oscillations were not disturbed by transient stimuli. Finally, phase alignment in P1-N1-P2 time windows was distorted during and shortly after steady state stimulation. We conclude that ssVEPs represent strongly phase locked oscillations sharing the same generation mechanisms as early evoked potentials.

Citing Articles

Spectral tuning and after-effects in neural entrainment.

Menetrey M, Pascucci D Behav Brain Funct. 2024; 20(1):29.

PMID: 39574159 PMC: 11580347. DOI: 10.1186/s12993-024-00259-6.


Anticipatory and evoked visual cortical dynamics of voluntary temporal attention.

Denison R, Tian K, Heeger D, Carrasco M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9061.

PMID: 39433743 PMC: 11494016. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53406-y.


The representation of priors and decisions in the human parietal cortex.

Marshall T, Ruesseler M, Hunt L, OReilly J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(1):e3002383.

PMID: 38285671 PMC: 10824454. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002383.


Top-down input modulates visual context processing through an interneuron-specific circuit.

Bastos G, Holmes J, Ross J, Rader A, Gallimore C, Wargo J Cell Rep. 2023; 42(9):113133.

PMID: 37708021 PMC: 10591868. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113133.


Deep psychophysiological phenotyping of adolescents and adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a multilevel approach to defining core disease processes.

Parker D, Cubells J, Imes S, Ruban G, Henshey B, Massa N BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):425.

PMID: 37312091 PMC: 10262114. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04888-5.


References
1.
Brandt M . Visual and auditory evoked phase resetting of the alpha EEG. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997; 26(1-3):285-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00771-x. View

2.
Silberstein R, Schier M, Pipingas A, Ciorciari J, Wood S, Simpson D . Steady-state visually evoked potential topography associated with a visual vigilance task. Brain Topogr. 1990; 3(2):337-47. DOI: 10.1007/BF01135443. View

3.
Ding J, Sperling G, Srinivasan R . Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 16(7):1016-29. PMC: 1880883. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj044. View

4.
Moratti S, Keil A, Miller G . Fear but not awareness predicts enhanced sensory processing in fear conditioning. Psychophysiology. 2006; 43(2):216-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-8986.2006.00386.x. View

5.
Moratti S, Keil A . Cortical activation during Pavlovian fear conditioning depends on heart rate response patterns: an MEG study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005; 25(2):459-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.006. View