Improved Sentinel Node Identification by SPECT/CT in Overweight Patients with Breast Cancer
Overview
Affiliations
Unlabelled: Overweight has been reported as a cause for the nonvisualization of sentinel nodes (SNs) on preoperative planar lymphoscintigraphy in patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess whether SPECT/CT may improve SN identification in overweight patients.
Methods: Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 220 consecutive patients with breast cancer. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each. A total of 122 patients were overweight or obese (BMI, > or = 25). Planar images and SPECT/CT images were interpreted separately, and SN identification on each of the modalities was related to BMI and to findings at surgery.
Results: Planar imaging identified SNs in 171 patients (78%) with a BMI (mean +/- SD) of 25.2 +/- 4 kg/m2 and failed to do so in 49 patients (22%) with a BMI of 28 +/- 8 kg/m2. In 29 of the latter patients (59%), SNs were identified on SPECT/CT. SPECT/CT detected "hot" nodes in 200 patients (91%) and failed to do so in 20 patients with a BMI of 29.2 +/- 6.6 kg/m2. For the 122 overweight or obese patients, planar assessment failed to identify SNs in 34 patients (28%) and SPECT/CT failed to do so in 13 patients (11%) (P < 0.001). For 116 patients, surgery took place in our hospital (Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center). An intraoperative blue dye technique failed to detect SNs in 48 patients (41%) with a BMI of 28.2 +/- 7 kg/m2. SPECT/CT localized hot nodes in 36 (75%) of the latter patients, and planar imaging did so in 22 (46%) of those patients. Of 19 patients for whom scintigraphy failed, 6 (32%) had nodal metastatic involvement.
Conclusion: The addition of SPECT/CT to lymphoscintigraphy improved SN identification in overweight patients with breast cancer. Moreover, SPECT/CT accurately identified SNs in 75% of patients for whom the identification of SNs by the intraoperative blue dye technique failed.
Assam I, Dierck S, Zhao Y, Juptner M, Siebert F, Zuhayra M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(8):e14077.
PMID: 37357570 PMC: 10402664. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14077.
Argentou M, Iliopoulos E, Verras G, Mulita F, Tchabashvili L, Spyridonidis T Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 17(4):641-651.
PMID: 36818500 PMC: 9909771. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.116406.
Applications of Computational Methods in Biomedical Breast Cancer Imaging Diagnostics: A Review.
Aruleba K, Obaido G, Ogbuokiri B, Fadaka A, Klein A, Adekiya T J Imaging. 2021; 6(10).
PMID: 34460546 PMC: 8321173. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging6100105.
Diabetes, Obesity, and Inflammation: Impact on Clinical and Radiographic Features of Breast Cancer.
Miller B, Chalfant H, Thomas A, Wellberg E, Henson C, McNally M Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(5).
PMID: 33803201 PMC: 7963150. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052757.
Ramirez-Nava G, Santos-Cuevas C, Ferro-Flores G, Ocampo-Garcia B, Chairez I, Gomez-Argumosa E Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2020; 2020:2728134.
PMID: 32489332 PMC: 7229544. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2728134.