Products of the Escherichia Coli Acid Fitness Island Attenuate Metabolite Stress at Extremely Low PH and Mediate a Cell Density-dependent Acid Resistance
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Escherichia coli has an ability, rare among the Enterobacteriaceae, to survive extreme acid stress under various host (e.g., human stomach) and nonhost (e.g., apple cider) conditions. Previous microarray studies have exposed a cluster of 12 genes at 79 centisomes collectively called an acid fitness island (AFI). Four AFI genes, gadA, gadX, gadW, and gadE, were already known to be involved in an acid resistance system that consumes an intracellular proton through the decarboxylation of glutamic acid. However, roles for the other eight AFI gene products were either unknown or subject to conflicting findings. Two new aspects of acid resistance are described that require participation of five of the remaining eight AFI genes. YhiF (a putative regulatory protein), lipoprotein Slp, and the periplasmic chaperone HdeA protected E. coli from organic acid metabolites produced during fermentation once the external pH was reduced to pH 2.5. HdeA appears to handle protein damage caused when protonated organic acids diffuse into the cell and dissociate, thereby decreasing internal pH. In contrast, YhiF- and Slp-dependent systems appear to counter the effects of the organic acids themselves, specifically succinate, lactate, and formate, but not acetate. A second phenomenon was defined by two other AFI genes, yhiD and hdeD, encoding putative membrane proteins. These proteins participate in an acid resistance mechanism exhibited only at high cell densities (>10(8) CFU per ml). Density-dependent acid resistance does not require any demonstrable secreted factor and may involve cell contact-dependent activation. These findings further define the complex physiology of E. coli acid resistance.
The transcriptional response to low temperature is weakly conserved across the .
Hoang J, Stoebel D mSystems. 2024; 9(12):e0078524.
PMID: 39589147 PMC: 11651113. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00785-24.
Advances in stress-tolerance elements for microbial cell factories.
Kuang Z, Yan X, Yuan Y, Wang R, Zhu H, Wang Y Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2024; 9(4):793-808.
PMID: 39072145 PMC: 11277822. DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2024.06.008.
RpoS and the bacterial general stress response.
Bouillet S, Bauer T, Gottesman S Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2024; 88(1):e0015122.
PMID: 38411096 PMC: 10966952. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00151-22.
Liu Y, Van Horn A, Pham M, Dinh B, Chen R, Raphael S Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(2):e0209623.
PMID: 38289137 PMC: 10880634. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02096-23.
Liu L, Tang S, Liu T, Zhang Z, Wang X, Bilal M Arch Microbiol. 2023; 205(12):372.
PMID: 37934297 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-023-03708-4.