» Articles » PMID: 17233548

Elderly Medical Patients Treated with Prophylactic Dosages of Enoxaparin: Influence of Renal Function on Anti-Xa Activity Level

Overview
Journal Drugs Aging
Specialties Geriatrics
Pharmacology
Date 2007 Jan 20
PMID 17233548
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The safety and optimal use of prophylactic treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins in elderly patients with impaired renal function remain undefined.

Methods: The primary aim of this study was to analyse, in 'real life', the influence of renal function, as assessed by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), on the level of anti-Xa activity in medical hospitalised elderly patients receiving prophylactic dosages of enoxaparin. Consecutive hospitalised acutely ill medical patients aged >or=75 years receiving daily dosages of enoxaparin 4000 IU for up to 10 days were prospectively enrolled in two centres. Peak anti-Xa activity was measured at the beginning and during the course of therapy.

Results: One hundred and twenty-five patients (31 men, 94 women), mean age 87.5 +/- 6.3 years, mean bodyweight 56.4 +/- 11.9 kg and mean CL(CR) 39.8 +/- 16.1 mL/min, were enrolled in the study. The mean maximum anti-Xa activity (day 1 to day 10) [anti-Xa(max1-10)] was 0.64 +/- 0.23 IU/mL (range 0.24-1.50 IU/mL). Weak negative correlations were found between CL(CR) and anti-Xa(max) and between bodyweight and anti-Xa(max). Mean anti-Xa(max) was slightly but significantly higher in patients with CL(CR) of 20-30 mL/min compared with patients with CL(CR) of 31-40, 41-50 or 51-80 mL/min (0.72 versus 0.61, 0.61 and 0.60 IU/mL, respectively), and in patients weighing <50 kg compared with patients weighing 50-60 kg or >60 kg (0.74 vs 0.64 and 0.52 IU/mL, respectively). Serious bleeding occurred in five patients, but anti-Xa(max) values in these patients were not different to those in patients without bleeding (p = 0.77). Individual anti-Xa(max) at the beginning or during the course of treatment was measured in the subgroup of 58 patients in whom anti-Xa activity was measured at least once during the study. The mean anti-Xa(max) value was slightly but significantly higher during the course of the therapy than at the beginning of the study (0.63 +/- 0.26 IU/mL vs 0.56 +/- 0.23 IU/mL, p = 0.012).

Conclusion: Only CL(CR) <30 mL/min and bodyweight <50 kg were associated with significantly higher anti-Xa(max) values. The clinical relevance of these increases remains questionable. No conclusions about the safety of enoxaparin in elderly medical patients can be drawn from these findings.

Citing Articles

Impact of perioperative low-molecular-weight heparin therapy on clinical events of elderly patients with prior coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Wang B, Su Y, Ma C, Xu L, Mao Q, Cheng W BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):171.

PMID: 38649992 PMC: 11036782. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03391-2.


Being precise with anticoagulation to reduce adverse drug reactions: are we there yet?.

Cross B, Turner R, Zhang J, Pirmohamed M Pharmacogenomics J. 2024; 24(2):7.

PMID: 38443337 PMC: 10914631. DOI: 10.1038/s41397-024-00329-y.


Trough anti-Xa activity after intermediate dose nadroparin for thrombosis prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and acute kidney injury.

Eck R, van de Leur J, Wiersema R, Cox E, Bult W, Spanjersberg A Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):17408.

PMID: 36257974 PMC: 9579123. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21560-2.


Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.

Saksena D, Mishra Y, Muralidharan S, Kanhere V, Srivastava P, Srivastava C Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 35(Suppl 1):3-44.

PMID: 33061064 PMC: 7525528. DOI: 10.1007/s12055-019-00789-z.


Evaluation of prophylactic dosages of Enoxaparin in non-surgical elderly patients with renal impairment.

Chamoun N, Ghanem H, Hachem A, Hariri E, Lteif C, Mansour H BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019; 20(1):27.

PMID: 31064405 PMC: 6505244. DOI: 10.1186/s40360-019-0308-8.


References
1.
Cohen A, Davidson B, Gallus A, Lassen M, Prins M, Tomkowski W . Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2006; 332(7537):325-9. PMC: 1363908. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38733.466748.7C. View

2.
Lamb E, Tomson C, Roderick P . Estimating kidney function in adults using formulae. Ann Clin Biochem. 2005; 42(Pt 5):321-45. DOI: 10.1258/0004563054889936. View

3.
Mahe I, Drouet L, Chassany O, Grenard A, Caulin C, Bergmann J . Low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis: a suitable monitoring in elderly patients?. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2002; 32(3):134-6. DOI: 10.1159/000065216. View

4.
Hirsh J, Raschke R . Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004; 126(3 Suppl):188S-203S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.188S. View

5.
Desjardins L, Bara L, Boutitie F, Samama M, Cohen A, Combe S . Correlation of plasma coagulation parameters with thromboprophylaxis, patient characteristics, and outcome in the MEDENOX study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004; 128(5):519-26. DOI: 10.5858/2004-128-519-COPCPW. View