» Articles » PMID: 17213491

Informatics Systems to Promote Improved Care for Chronic Illness: a Literature Review

Overview
Date 2007 Jan 11
PMID 17213491
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To understand information systems components important in supporting team-based care of chronic illness through a literature search.

Design: Systematic search of literature from 1996-2005 for evaluations of information systems used in the care of chronic illness.

Measurements: The relationship of design, quality, information systems components, setting, and other factors with process, quality outcomes, and health care costs was evaluated.

Results: In all, 109 articles were reviewed involving 112 information system descriptions. Chronic diseases targeted included diabetes (42.9% of reviewed articles), heart disease (36.6%), and mental illness (23.2%), among others. System users were primarily physicians, nurses, and patients. Sixty-seven percent of reviewed experiments had positive outcomes; 94% of uncontrolled, observational studies claimed positive results. Components closely correlated with positive experimental results were connection to an electronic medical record, computerized prompts, population management (including reports and feedback), specialized decision support, electronic scheduling, and personal health records. Barriers identified included costs, data privacy and security concerns, and failure to consider workflow. CONCLUSION The majority of published studies revealed a positive impact of specific health information technology components on chronic illness care. Implications for future research and system designs are discussed.

Citing Articles

Factors Influencing the Implementation of Digital Advance Care Planning: Qualitative Interview Study.

Bradshaw A, Birtwistle J, Evans C, Sleeman K, Richards S, Foy R J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50217.

PMID: 39151167 PMC: 11364948. DOI: 10.2196/50217.


The Efficacy of Health Information Technology in Supporting Health Equity for Black and Hispanic Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.

Senteio C, Murdock P J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(4):e22124.

PMID: 35377331 PMC: 9016513. DOI: 10.2196/22124.


MULTIPROFESSIONAL ELECTRONIC PROTOCOL FOR DIGESTIVE SURGERY VALIDATION.

Kalil-Filho F, Pinto J, Borsato E, Kuretzki C, Ariede B, Mathias J Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021; 34(2):e1583.

PMID: 34669879 PMC: 8521891. DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1583.


Health information technology to improve care for people with multiple chronic conditions.

Samal L, Fu H, Camara D, Wang J, Bierman A, Dorr D Health Serv Res. 2021; 56 Suppl 1:1006-1036.

PMID: 34363220 PMC: 8515226. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13860.


The Causal Relationship Between Portal Usage and Self-Efficacious Health Information-Seeking Behaviors: Secondary Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey Data.

Park J, Liang M, Alpert J, Brown R, Zhong X J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(1):e17782.

PMID: 33502334 PMC: 7875689. DOI: 10.2196/17782.


References
1.
Leavitt M, Gallagher L . The EHR seal of approval: CCHIT introduces product certification to spur EHR adoption. J AHIMA. 2006; 77(5):26-30. View

2.
Noel H, Vogel D, Erdos J, Cornwall D, Levin F . Home telehealth reduces healthcare costs. Telemed J E Health. 2004; 10(2):170-83. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.170. View

3.
Meigs J, Cagliero E, Dubey A, Murphy-Sheehy P, Gildesgame C, Chueh H . A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(3):750-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.750. View

4.
Lobach D, Hammond W . Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. Am J Med. 1997; 102(1):89-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)00382-8. View

5.
Murray M, Harris L, Overhage J, Zhou X, Eckert G, Smith F . Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy. 2004; 24(3):324-37. DOI: 10.1592/phco.24.4.324.33173. View