» Articles » PMID: 17211807

Proximate Causes of Rensch's Rule: Does Sexual Size Dimorphism in Arthropods Result from Sex Differences in Development Time?

Overview
Journal Am Nat
Specialties Biology
Science
Date 2007 Jan 11
PMID 17211807
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A prominent interspecific pattern of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is Rensch's rule, according to which male body size is more variable or evolutionarily divergent than female body size. Assuming equal growth rates of males and females, SSD would be entirely mediated, and Rensch's rule proximately caused, by sexual differences in development times, or sexual bimaturism (SBM), with the larger sex developing for a proportionately longer time. Only a subset of the seven arthropod groups investigated in this study exhibits Rensch's rule. Furthermore, we found only a weak positive relationship between SSD and SBM overall, suggesting that growth rate differences between the sexes are more important than development time differences in proximately mediating SSD in a wide but by no means comprehensive range of arthropod taxa. Except when protandry is of selective advantage (as in many butterflies, Hymenoptera, and spiders), male development time was equal to (in water striders and beetles) or even longer than (in drosophilid and sepsid flies) that of females. Because all taxa show female-biased SSD, this implies faster growth of females in general, a pattern markedly different from that of primates and birds (analyzed here for comparison). We discuss three potential explanations for this pattern based on life-history trade-offs and sexual selection.

Citing Articles

Exploring shape diversity and sexual dimorphism in two populations of Nigma conducens through geometric morphometrics.

El-Masry S, Ismail T, Mustafa A BMC Zool. 2025; 10(1):4.

PMID: 39923083 PMC: 11806776. DOI: 10.1186/s40850-025-00224-4.


Annual temperature, body size, and sexual size dimorphism in the evolution of Pyrgomorphidae.

Cueva Del Castillo R, Sanabria-Urban S, Marino-Perez R, Song H Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70188.

PMID: 39170049 PMC: 11338691. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70188.


Sex-biased phenotypic plasticity affects sexual dimorphism patterns under changing environmental conditions.

Cordeschi G, Canestrelli D, Porretta D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):892.

PMID: 38195624 PMC: 10776787. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51204-6.


Size rather than complexity of sexual ornaments prolongs male metamorphosis and explains sexual size dimorphism in sepsid flies.

Rajaratnam G, Lui G, Su K, Chew M, Ang Y, Puniamoorthy N Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(1998):20222531.

PMID: 37132233 PMC: 10154940. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2531.


Sexual size and shape dimorphism, and allometric scaling in the pupal and adult traits of .

Ludoski J, Francuski L, Gojkovic N, Matic B, Milankov V Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(3):e9907.

PMID: 36937060 PMC: 10015363. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9907.