» Articles » PMID: 17208571

Outcome of Excision of Megarectum in Children with Anorectal Malformation

Overview
Journal J Pediatr Surg
Date 2007 Jan 9
PMID 17208571
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/purpose: Megarectum in association with anorectal malformation contributes to chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. Resection of megarectum in anorectal malformation improves bowel function, but neuropathy and poor sphincter quality may affect the outcome of fecal continence adversely. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of resection of megarectum in anorectal malformation and to ascertain the impact of anal sphincter quality and neuropathy on the outcome.

Methods: We studied 62 children with intractable fecal incontinence after repair of anorectal malformation between January 1991 and January 2005. All patients were investigated with anorectal manometry and anal endosonography under ketamine anesthesia. On endosonography, an intact or scarred internal anal sphincter (IAS) was classified as good and a fragmented or absent IAS as poor. On manometry, a resting anal sphincter pressure equal to or more than 30 mm Hg was classified as good and a lower pressure as poor. Functional assessment of fecal continence was done before and after excision of megarectum using a modified Wingfield scores.

Results: Sixteen children had excision of megarectum with median age of 9 years (range, 2-15 years) and postoperative follow-up of 5 years (range, 1-10 years). Seven had formation of antegrade continent enema stoma before excision of megarectum. Children were classified into three groups of anomalies: low (n = 6), intermediate (n = 4), and high (n = 6). All children were incontinent of feces. After excision of megarectum, of the 9 children with good IAS and no neuropathy, 7 became continent of feces. Of the remaining 7 children, 4 had poor IAS and 3 had neuropathy, 5 of whom required an antegrade continent enema stoma to be clean.

Conclusion: Excision of megarectum in children who had previous repair of anorectal malformation results in fecal continence in the presence of a good IAS and absence of neuropathy. Patients with a poor IAS or neuropathy will often require artificial means of fecal continence.

Citing Articles

State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Anorectal Malformations.

Bokova E, Svetanoff W, Lopez J, Levitt M, Rentea R Children (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37238394 PMC: 10217060. DOI: 10.3390/children10050846.


Post-Operative Anorectal Manometry in Children following Anorectal Malformation Repair: A Systematic Review.

Evans-Barns H, Tien M, Trajanovska M, Safe M, Hutson J, Dinning P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37048627 PMC: 10094903. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072543.


Expression of the P2Y2 receptor in the terminal rectum of fetal rats with anorectal malformation.

Liu Y, Kong M, Jin Z, Gao M, Qu Y, Zheng Z Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(2):1669-76.

PMID: 25932095 PMC: 4402742.


Combined vertical reduction rectoplasty and sacral nerve stimulation for rectal evacuatory dysfunction and faecal incontinence associated with previous anorectal malformation.

Boyle D, Gill K, Ward H, Scott S, Lunniss P, Williams N Tech Coloproctol. 2009; 15(3):353-5.

PMID: 19960219 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-009-0544-9.


Evaluation of outcome of anorectal anomaly in childhood: the role of anorectal manometry and endosonography.

Keshtgar A, Athanasakos E, Clayden G, Ward H Pediatr Surg Int. 2008; 24(8):885-92.

PMID: 18512062 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-008-2181-1.