» Articles » PMID: 17208388

Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Conventional Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for High-grade Gliomas: Does IMRT Increase the Integral Dose to Normal Brain?

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2007 Jan 9
PMID 17208388
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment increases the total integral dose of nontarget tissue relative to the conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique for high-grade gliomas.

Methods And Materials: Twenty patients treated with 3D-CRT for glioblastoma multiforme were selected for a comparative dosimetric evaluation with IMRT. Original target volumes, organs at risk (OAR), and dose-volume constraints were used for replanning with IMRT. Predicted isodose distributions, cumulative dose-volume histograms of target volumes and OAR, normal tissue integral dose, target coverage, dose conformity, and normal tissue sparing with 3D-CRT and IMRT planning were compared. Statistical analyses were performed to determine differences.

Results: In all 20 patients, IMRT maintained equivalent target coverage, improved target conformity (conformity index [CI] 95% 1.52 vs. 1.38, p < 0.001), and enabled dose reductions of normal tissues, including brainstem (D(mean) by 19.8% and D(max) by 10.7%), optic chiasm (D(mean) by 25.3% and D(max) by 22.6%), right optic nerve (D(mean) by 37.3% and D(max) by 28.5%), and left optic nerve (D(mean) by 40.6% and D(max) by 36.7%), p < or = 0.01. This was achieved without increasing the total nontarget integral dose by greater than 0.5%. Overall, total integral dose was reduced by 7-10% with IMRT, p < 0.001, without significantly increasing the 0.5-5 Gy low-dose volume.

Conclusions: These results indicate that IMRT treatment for high-grade gliomas allows for improved target conformity, better critical tissue sparing, and importantly does so without increasing integral dose and the volume of normal tissue exposed to low doses of radiation.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of normal tissue neurovascular unit damage following brain irradiation-Factors affecting damage severity and timing of effects.

Nakkazi A, Forster D, Whitfield G, Dyer D, Dickie B Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae098.

PMID: 39239570 PMC: 11375288. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae098.


Revolutionizing Brain Tumor Care: Emerging Technologies and Strategies.

Nguyen T, Greene L, Mnatsakanyan H, Badr C Biomedicines. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38927583 PMC: 11202201. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061376.


Simultaneous boost radiotherapy versus conventional dose radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a multi-institutional analysis.

Takano S, Tomita N, Kuno M, Niwa M, Torii A, Takaoka T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9283.

PMID: 38654028 PMC: 11039761. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60154-y.


Optimization of collimator angle combined island blocking with parked gap achieves superior normal tissue sparing in SBRT planning of multiple liver lesions.

Abuduxiku M, Chen X, Zhang S, Yang J, Liao W, Xiao J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(6):e14267.

PMID: 38259201 PMC: 11163495. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14267.


Personalized Treatment of Glioblastoma: Current State and Future Perspective.

Roncevic A, Koruga N, Soldo Koruga A, Roncevic R, Rotim T, Simundic T Biomedicines. 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 37371674 PMC: 10296009. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11061579.