» Articles » PMID: 17202903

Does Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Benefit Whiplash Recovery?: Results of a Population-based Incidence Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2007 Jan 5
PMID 17202903
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Population-based, incidence cohort.

Objectives: To evaluate a government policy of funding community and hospital-based fitness training and multidisciplinary rehabilitation for whiplash.

Summary Of Background Data: Although insurance benefits commonly include rehabilitation for whiplash, its effectiveness is unknown.

Methods: All Saskatchewan adults treated for whiplash (n = 6,021) over a 2-year period were followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Recovery was defined by self-report of improvement. Recovery times were compared between those attending fitness training at health clubs (n = 833), multidisciplinary outpatient rehabilitation (n = 468), and multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation (n = 135) to those receiving usual insured individual care.

Results: Recovery was 32% slower in those receiving fitness training within 69 days of injury (P = 0.001) and 19% slower when received within 119 days of injury (P = 0.041). Recovery was 50% slower in those receiving outpatient rehabilitation within 119 days of injury (P = 0.001). Attending inpatient rehabilitation did not influence recovery rates during the follow up (P = 0.131). Multivariable adjustment for important prognostic factors did not change these results.

Conclusions: We found no evidence to support the effectiveness of a population-based program of fitness training and multidisciplinary rehabilitation for whiplash. Rehabilitation programs should be tested in randomized trials before being recommended to injured populations.

Citing Articles

Multivariable prediction models for the recovery of and claim closure related to post-collision neck pain and associated disorders.

Stupar M, Cote P, Carroll L, Brison R, Boyle E, Shearer H Chiropr Man Therap. 2023; 31(1):32.

PMID: 37626364 PMC: 10464149. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00504-1.


The Whiplash Disease Reconsidered.

Astrup J, Gyntelberg F Front Neurol. 2022; 13:821097.

PMID: 35359634 PMC: 8960646. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.821097.


Use of Soft Cervical Collar among Whiplash Patients in Two Italian Emergency Departments Is Associated with Persistence of Symptoms: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Mourad F, Rossettini G, Galeno E, Patuzzo A, Zolla G, Maselli F Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(10).

PMID: 34683043 PMC: 8544415. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9101363.


The role of non-rigid cervical collar in pain relief and functional restoration after whiplash injury: a systematic review and a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ricciardi L, Stifano V, DArrigo S, Polli F, Olivi A, Sturiale C Eur Spine J. 2019; 28(8):1821-1828.

PMID: 31214856 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06035-9.


Is a government-regulated rehabilitation guideline more effective than general practitioner education or preferred-provider rehabilitation in promoting recovery from acute whiplash-associated disorders? A pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Cote P, Boyle E, Shearer H, Stupar M, Jacobs C, Cassidy J BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e021283.

PMID: 30679283 PMC: 6347946. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021283.