» Articles » PMID: 17202254

Neural Substrates of Envisioning the Future

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Jan 5
PMID 17202254
Citations 205
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to envision specific future episodes is a ubiquitous mental phenomenon that has seldom been discussed in the neuroscience literature. In this study, subjects underwent functional MRI while using event cues (e.g., Birthday) as a guide to vividly envision a personal future event, remember a personal memory, or imagine an event involving a familiar individual. Two basic patterns of data emerged. One set of regions (e.g., within left lateral premotor cortex; left precuneus; right posterior cerebellum) was more active while envisioning the future than while recollecting the past (and more active in both of these conditions than in the task involving imagining another person). These regions appear similar to those emerging from the literature on imagined (simulated) bodily movements. A second set of regions (e.g., bilateral posterior cingulate; bilateral parahippocampal gyrus; left occipital cortex) demonstrated indistinguishable activity during the future and past tasks (but greater activity in both tasks than the imagery control task); similar regions have been shown to be important for remembering previously encountered visual-spatial contexts. Hence, differences between the future and past tasks are attributed to differences in the demands placed on regions that underlie motor imagery of bodily movements, and similarities in activity for these two tasks are attributed to the reactivation of previously experienced visual-spatial contexts. That is, subjects appear to place their future scenarios in well known visual-spatial contexts. Our results offer insight into the fundamental and little-studied capacity of vivid mental projection of oneself in the future.

Citing Articles

Functional movement disorder is associated with abnormal interoceptive brain activity: a task-based functional MRI study.

Spagnolo P, Parker J, Hallett M, Horovitz S Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1473913.

PMID: 40060743 PMC: 11885509. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1473913.


Memory consolidation from a reinforcement learning perspective.

Lee J, Jung M Front Comput Neurosci. 2025; 18():1538741.

PMID: 39845091 PMC: 11751224. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1538741.


Cuttlefish favour their current need to hide rather than their future need for food.

Lisa P, Anthony R, Billard P, Cecile B, Christelle J Learn Behav. 2025; 53(1):128-135.

PMID: 39762689 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-024-00663-y.


Distributed Cortical Regions for the Recall of People, Places, and Objects.

Kidder A, Silson E, Nau M, Baker C eNeuro. 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39746804 PMC: 11735654. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0496-24.2024.


Shape of the past: Revealing detail arcs while narrating memories of autobiographical life events across the lifespan.

Knoff A, Andrews-Hanna J, Grilli M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; .

PMID: 39402395 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02592-3.


References
1.
Kwong K, Belliveau J, Chesler D, Goldberg I, Weisskoff R, Poncelet B . Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89(12):5675-9. PMC: 49355. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675. View

2.
Ghaem O, Mellet E, Crivello F, Tzourio N, Mazoyer B, Berthoz A . Mental navigation along memorized routes activates the hippocampus, precuneus, and insula. Neuroreport. 1997; 8(3):739-44. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199702100-00032. View

3.
Cavanna A, Trimble M . The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain. 2006; 129(Pt 3):564-83. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl004. View

4.
Baker S, Rogers R, Owen A, Frith C, Dolan R, Frackowiak R . Neural systems engaged by planning: a PET study of the Tower of London task. Neuropsychologia. 1996; 34(6):515-26. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00133-6. View

5.
Schacter D, Buckner R . Priming and the brain. Neuron. 1998; 20(2):185-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80448-1. View